Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr;44(4):396–402. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7807

Table 2:

Demographic and cognitive clinical variables of the subjects included in this studya

Cognitive Examination First Follow-Up (n = 65) Second Follow-Up (n = 32)
Age (mean) (range) (yr) 36.5 (SD, 10.1) (21–62) 45.9 (SD, 10.5) (29–61)
Sex (M/F) 26:39 13:19
DD (mean) (yr) 15.0 (SD, 7.1) 18.6 (SD, 7.7)
SDMT z score (mean) –1.3 (SD, 1.2) –1.1 (SD, 1.1)
BVMT z score (mean) –0.9 (SD, 1.5) –0.6 (SD, 1.4)
CVLT z score (mean) –0.6 (SD, 1.4) –0.4 (SD, 1.5)
BICAMS z score (mean) –0.9 (SD, 1.1) –0.7 (SD, 1.0)
FU time from baseline (mean) (yr) 4.6 (SD, 1.0) 7.5 (SD, 0.7)
ΔBICAMS (mean) NA –0.3 (SD, 0.8)
Cognitive impairment (impaired/preserved) 40/25 NA
Cognitive progression NA 5/32 (15.6%)

Note:—FU indicates follow-up.

a

Cognitive impairment at the first time point was defined if a subject showed at least one of the z score values of equal or less than –1.5. Cognitive worsening at second time point was defined in case of ΔBICAMS equal or less than –0.5.