Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;51(6):2800–2817. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad080

Table 1.

Cryo-EM structure determination and model statistics for SpRecA-ssDNA and SpRecA-dsDNA complexes

Data collection SpRecA–ssDNA complex SpRecA–dsDNA complex
Magnification X190 000 X120 000
Defocus range (μm) –0.8 to –2.5 –0.8 to –2.5
Voltage (kV) 200 200
Microscope Talos Talos
Camera Falcon 3 Falcon 3
Frame exposure time (s) 0.8 1
# movie frames 40 20
Total electron dose (e−2) 36 60
Pixel size (Å) 0.76 1.24
Reconstruction RecA–ssDNA complex RecA–dsDNA complex
Boxe size (pixel) 180 180
Inter-box distance (Å) 100 100
# segments extracted 363 828 1 109 194
# segements after Class2D 188 475 715 954
Resolution (Å) 3.9 3.8
Map sharpening B-factor (Å-2) –141.9 –153.07
Helical rise (Å) 15.38 14.97
Helical twist (°) 58.46 58.62
Atomic model RecA–ssDNA complex RecA–dsDNA complex
Chains 9 10
# unique non-hydrogen atoms 10 381 10 515
R.m.s.d. Length (Å) 0.006 0.007
R.m.s.d. Angles (°) 0.993 0.963
Molprobity score 1.84 1.86
Molprobity clashscore, all atoms 5.10 6.90
Ramachandran outliers (%) 0 0
Ramachandran allowed (%) 10.73 7.85
Ramachandran favored (%) 89.27 92.15
Rotamer outliers (%) 0.77 0.77
Cβ outliers (%) 0 0
Model versus map RecA–ssDNA complex RecA–dsDNA complex
Correlation coefficient (mask) 0.80 0.84
Correlation coefficient (box) 0.51 0.55
Correlation coefficient (peaks) 0.25 0.25
Correlation coefficient (volume) 0.80 0.84
Correlation coefficient CC for ligands 0.80 0.87