Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb 1;11(4):1243–1252.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.026

Table 1:

Users’ assessment of the AAT

All Resident ID Specialist Pharmacist
Number of users 102 42 21 39
AAT is easy to use (%) 72 (70.6) 27 (64.3) 18(85.7) 27 (69.2)
Would use AAT in clinical practice (%) 97 (95.1) 39 (92.9) 20 (95.2) 38 (97.4)
AAT is the preferred resource (%) 88 (86.3) 37 (88.1) 20 (95.2) 31 (79.5)
Settings in which user would use AAT* (%)
Inpatient 102 (100.0) 42 (100.0) 21 (100.0) 39 (100.0)
Outpatient 72 (70.6) 33 (78.6) 19 (90.5) 20 (51.3)
Emergency Department 53 (52.0) 25 (59.5) 9 (42.9) 19 (48.7)
Other 6 (5.9) 4 (9.5) 1 (4.8) 1 (2.6)
Most useful modality to access AAT (%)
Link in the electronic medical record 56 (54.9) 20 (47.6) 13 (61.9) 23 (59.0)
Link on the pharmacy intranet or housestaff manual 14 (13.8) 2 (4.8) 0 (0.0) 12 (30.8)
Mobile application 26 (25.5) 16 (38.1) 8 (38.1) 2 (5.1)
Other 6 (5.9) 4 (9.5) 0 (0.0) 2 (5.1)
*

Users could choose one or more settings.