Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;13:1144269. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1144269

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of RRM2 expression association with clinical pathological characteristics.

Characteristics Total (N) Odds Ratio (OR) P value
T stage (T1&T2 vs. T3&T4) 371 1.698 (1.057-2.753) 0.030
N stage (N0 vs. N1) 258 2.522 (0.318-51.354) 0.426
M stage (M0 vs. M1) 272 0.291 (0.014-2.308) 0.288
Pathologic stage (Stage I &Stage II vs. Stage III &Stage IV) 350 1.723 (1.063-2.821) 0.029
Tumor status (With tumor vs. Tumor free) 355 1.640 (1.076-2.511) 0.022
Gender (Male vs. Female) 374 0.764 (0.494-1.179) 0.225
Age (>60 vs. ≤60) 373 0.629 (0.417-0.946) 0.026
Residual tumor (R0 vs. R1&R2) 345 1.044 (0.398-2.738) 0.930
Histologic grade (G1&G2 vs. G3&G4) 369 2.893 (1.870-4.524) <0.001
AFP (ng/ml) (>400 vs. ≤400) 280 3.768 (2.084-7.065) <0.001
Adjacent hepatic tissue inflammation (None vs. Mild &Severe) 237 1.207 (0.724-2.016) 0.471
Child-Pugh grade (A vs. B&C) 241 1.402 (0.581-3.452) 0.452
Vascular invasion (NO vs. YES) 318 1.403 (0.883-2.236) 0.152