Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;13:1144269. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1144269

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for RRM2 expression.

Characteristics Total (N) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
T stage 370
T1&T2 277
T3&T4 93 2.598 (1.826-3.697) <0.001 1.658 (0.225-12.238) 0.620
N stage 258
N0 254
N1 4 2.029 (0.497-8.281) 0.324
M stage 272
M0 268
M1 4 4.077 (1.281-12.973) 0.017 1.826 (0.415-8.028) 0.426
Gender 373
Female 121
Male 252 0.793 (0.557-1.130) 0.200
Age 373
≤60 177
>60 196 1.205 (0.850-1.708) 0.295
Pathologic stage 349
Stage I &Stage II 259
Stage III &Stage IV 90 2.504 (1.727-3.631) <0.001 1.392 (0.189-10.257) 0.745
Histologic grade 368
G1&G2 233
G3&G4 135 1.091 (0.761-1.564) 0.636
Vascular invasion 317
No 208
Yes 109 1.344 (0.887-2.035) 0.163
Tumor status 354
Tumor free 202
With tumor 152 2.317 (1.590-3.376) <0.001 1.867 (1.164-2.993) 0.010
Adjacent hepatic tissue inflammation 236
None 118
Mild &Severe 118 1.194 (0.734-1.942) 0.475
AFP (ng/ml) 279
≤400 215
>400 64 1.075 (0.658-1.759) 0.772
RRM2 373
Low 187
High 186 1.698 (1.197-2.409) 0.003 1.626 (1.010-2.619) 0.045