Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;19(5):1352–1368. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.79022

Table 1.

Clinical relevance of TANs in T1b gastric cancer.

Clinicopathologic Features TANs χ2 P
Low (n=137) (%) High (n=120) (%)
Gender Male 97 (53.0) 86 (47.0) 0.023 0.891
Female 40 (54.1) 34 (45.9)
Age (year) <65 76 (55.9) 60 (44.1) 0.565 0.384
≥65 61 (50.4) 60 (49.6)
Tumor location in the stomach Upper third 36 (55.4) 29 (44.6) 0.170 0.934
Middle third 35 (52.2) 32 (47.8)
Lower third 66 (52.8) 59 (47.2)
Tumor diameter (cm) <2 55 (51.9) 51 (48.1) 0.365 0.854
2~3 47 (56.0) 37 (44.0)
≥3 35 (52.2) 32 (47.8)
Macroscopic type Elevated 9 (31.0) 20 (69.0) 7.115 0.026
Flat 13 (65.0) 7 (35.0)
Depressed 115 (55.3) 93 (44.7)
Depth of invasion Sm1 38 (55.1) 31 (44.9) 0.041 0.779
Sm2 99 (52.7) 89 (47.3)
Lauren classification Intestinal 93 (57.1) 70 (42.9) 9.551 0.022
Diffuse 19 (67.9) 9 (32.1)
Mixed 19 (38.8) 30 (61.2)
Not defined 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7)
Histological classification Well 31 (75.6) 10 (24.4) 10.798 0.004
Moderately 61 (46.6) 70 (53.4)
Poorly 45 (52.9) 40 (47.1)
Lymphatic invasion Absence 114 (59.7) 77 (40.3) 11.179 0.001
Presence 23 (34.8) 43 (65.2)
Perineural invasion Absence 129 (53.5) 112 (46.5) 0.000 0.802
Presence 8 (50.0) 8 (50.0)
H. pylori infection Absence 101 (54.3) 85 (45.7) 0.142 0.675
Presence 36 (50.7) 35 (49.3)
Lymph node metastasis Absence 120 (61.2) 76 (38.8) 19.476 0.000
Presence 17 (27.9) 44 (72.1)