TABLE 2.

Effect estimates from pairwise and network meta‐analyses for g/wk at 1 month

Comparison	Direct estimate (95% CI) [no. of studies] randomised participants	I 2	Tau 2	Network estimate [31 studies] 13 239 participants
Practitioner delivered vs digitally delivered	−4 g/wk (−45 to 37) [3 studies] 321 participants	32.9	473	−23 (−43 to −2)
Practitioner delivered vs control (minimal alcohol information)	−62 (−93 to −33) [3 studies] 702 participants	0.0%	0.0	−40 (−65 to −16)
Practitioner delivered vs control (assessment only)	−44 (−62 to −28) [6 studies] 865 participants	0.0%	0.0	−46 (−66 to −27)
Digitally delivered vs control (minimal alcohol information)	−10 (−23 to 4) [5 studies] 763 participants	0.0%	0.0	−18 (−38 to 3)
Digitally delivered vs control (assessment only)	−26 (−38 to −14) [18 studies] 11 082 participants	72.8%	367	−24 (−35 to −13)
Control (minimal alcohol information) vs control (assessment only)	[No studies]	–	–	−6 (−28 to 16)