TABLE 6.
Effect estimates from pairwise and network meta‐analyses for g/wk at 12 months
| Comparison | Direct estimate (95% CI) [no. of studies] randomised participants | I 2 | Tau 2 | Network estimate [45 studies] 25 288 participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Practitioner delivered vs digitally delivered | [No studies] | – | – | −6 (−24 to 12) |
| Practitioner delivered vs control (minimal alcohol information) |
−19 (−30 to −7) [18 studies] 6482 participants |
31.7% | 172.75 | −19 (−32 to −7) |
| Practitioner delivered vs control (assessment only) |
−22 (−33 to −10) [19 studies] 10 671 participants |
75.9% | 439.87 | −21 (−31 to −11) |
| Digitally delivered vs control (minimal alcohol information) |
−14 (−33 to 5) [2 studies] 3228 participants |
0.0% | 0.00 | −14 (−33 to 5) |
| Digitally delivered vs control (assessment only) |
−15 (−32 to 2) [7 studies] 5045 participants |
46.6% | 216.13 | −16 (−32 to 1) |
| Control (minimal alcohol information) vs control (assessment only) |
−8 (−37 to 22) [3 studies] 1220 participants |
0.0% | 0.00 | −1 (−16 to 13) |