TABLE 3.
Significant improvement of the GAS between baseline and 21 days post‐injection (PP population)
Global aesthetic clinical score | Lips | Nasolabial folds | Marionette lines | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D0 | D21 | D0 | D21 | D0 | D21 | ||
0 | N | 4 | ‐ | ‐ | 3 | ‐ | 2 |
% | 12% | ‐ | ‐ | 5% | ‐ | 6% | |
0.5 | N | 3 | 2 | ‐ | 3 | ‐ | 5 |
% | 9% | 6% | ‐ | 5% | ‐ | 14% | |
1 | N | 16 | 5 | ‐ | 24 | ‐ | 10 |
% | 47% | 15% | ‐ | 39% | ‐ | 28% | |
1.5 | N | 11 | 12 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 8 |
% | 32% | 35% | 2% | 24% | 3% | 22% | |
2 | N | ‐ | 11 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 6 |
% | ‐ | 32% | 11% | 19% | 19% | 17% | |
2.5 | N | ‐ | 4 | 22 | 5 | 10 | 5 |
% | ‐ | 12% | 35% | 8% | 28% | 14% | |
3 | N | ‐ | ‐ | 32 | ‐ | 18 | ‐ |
% | ‐ | ‐ | 52% | ‐ | 50% | ‐ | |
Success (at least −1 grade vs. D0) a | N | 25 | 61 | 34 | |||
% | 73.5% | 98.4% | 94.4% | ||||
N | 34 | 34 | 62 | 62 | 36 | 36 | |
Mean | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | |
SD | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | |
Min | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | |
Median | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | |
Max | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | |
p‐Value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
+1 grade for the lips.