. 2022 Sep 1;28(1):208–220. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12620

TABLE 5.

Effects of context on COM‐B, N = 624

Variable

Work

Public transport

Leisure

N_{p}^{2}

Face Covering (0%–100%)

37.65

38.76

81.51

35.76

26.39

35.73

545.04

<.01

.47

Physical Capability: “I am PHYSICALLY able to wear a face covering at work/on public transport/doing leisure activities” (0–10)

8.36

2.32

8.79

2.16

7.40

3.06

90.19

<.01

.23

Psychological Capability: “I am PSYCHOLOGICALLY able to wear a face covering at work/on public transport/doing leisure activities” (0–10)

7.82

2.72

8.43

2.56

7.07

3.17

97.38

<.01

.24

Physical Opportunity: “Of the time you spent working/on public transport/doing leisure activities in the last 7 days, roughly what percentage of it did you have the PHYSICAL opportunity to wear a face covering?” (0%–100%)

72.99

37.80

89.57

26.88

60.41

42.28

179.53

<.01

.36

Social Opportunity: “Of the time you spent working/on public transport/doing leisure activities in the last 7 days, roughly what percentage of it did you have the SOCIAL opportunity to wear a face covering?” (0%–100%)

64.76

40.30

86.69

28.65

48.89

42.27

265.97

<.01

.46

Reflective Motivation: “I am motivated to wear a face covering at work/on public transport/doing leisure activities” (0–10)

5.77

3.47

7.65

3.29

5.39

3.60

212.94

<.01

.41

Automatic Motivation: “Wearing a face covering at work/on public transport/doing leisure activities is something that I do automatically” (0–10)

5.57

3.69

7.48

3.34

5.30

3.61

193.20

<.01

.38

Note: Simple contrasts show significant differences (p < .01) between work versus public transport, work versus leisure and leisure versus public transport.