Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD000214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000214.pub2

Comparison 1. The effect of training health professionals on patient smoking cessation.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Smoking cessation at longest follow‐up 15   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Point prevalence 14 13459 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.36 [1.20, 1.55]
1.2 Continuous abstinence 8 9443 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.60 [1.26, 2.03]
2 Patient asked to set a quit date 8 4332 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.98 [2.29, 10.86]
3 Patient asked to make a follow‐up appointment 7 3114 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.34 [1.51, 7.37]
4 Number of smokers counselled 14 8531 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.28 [1.58, 3.27]
5 Number of smokers receiving self‐help material 9 4925 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.52 [1.90, 6.52]
6 Number of smokers receiving nicotine gum/replacement therapy 9 5073 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.57 [0.87, 2.84]
7 Number of smokers prescribed a quit date 3 1172 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 14.18 [6.57, 30.61]