Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD000214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000214.pub2

Comparison 5. Sub‐group: mode of intervention delivery.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Patient asked to set a quit date 8   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 One‐on‐one 4 2353 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.52 [2.17, 26.12]
1.2 Group sessions 8 4332 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.98 [1.79, 13.88]
2 Patient asked to make a follow‐up appointment 7   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 One‐on‐one 3 1135 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.60 [0.86, 15.08]
2.2 Group sessions 6 2596 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.74 [1.06, 7.08]
3 Number of smokers counselled 14   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 One‐on‐one 6 3762 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.76 [1.27, 6.01]
3.2 Group sessions 12 7438 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.47 [1.41, 4.30]
4 Number of smokers receiving self‐help material 9   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 One‐on‐one 3 1451 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 6.09 [3.93, 9.44]
4.2 Group sessions 8 4407 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.22 [1.36, 7.65]
5 Number of smokers receiving nicotine gum/replacement therapy 9   Odds Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 One‐on‐one 2 941 Odds Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.41, 1.87]
5.2 Group sessions 8 4498 Odds Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.65 [0.68, 4.01]