Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 11;21:138. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02827-5

Table 2.

Programme impact and cost assumptions used for RSV prevention strategies in the model comparison exercise

Input parameter Maternal vaccine Source Infant mAb Source
Impact of RSV prevention strategy
 Programme coverage* ANC (proxy) Baral et al. [16] BCG (proxy) WUENIC [50]
 Efficacy (RSV severe cases) 69.4% Pfizer [34] 77.3% Sanofi [52]
 Efficacy (RSV non-severe cases) 51.3% Pfizer [34] 74.5% Sanofi [52]
 Duration of protection (fixed for n months) 6 Pfizer [34] 5 Sanofi [52]
Percentage wastage
 Doses 5.00% Assumption 5.00% Assumption
 Syringes 5.00% Assumption 5.00% Assumption
 Safety boxes 5.00% Assumption 5.00% Assumption
Price per dose (US$)
 GAVI countries US$ 3.50 Assumption US$ 3.50 Assumption
 Non-GAVI countries US$ 7.00 Assumption US$ 7.00 Assumption
International handling (% of dose price)
 GAVI countries 1.40% UNICEF [58] 1.40% UNICEF [58]
 Non-GAVI countries 3.50% UNICEF [58] 3.50% UNICEF [58]
International transportation (% of dose price)
 All countries 6.00% Debellut [61] 6.00% Debellut [61]
Other injection supply costs
 Syringe price per dose (US$) US$ 0.0278 UNICEF [54] US$ 0.0278 UNICEF [54]
 Safety box price per dose (US$) US$ 0.0121 UNICEF [54] US$ 0.0121 UNICEF [54]
Incremental health system cost per dose (US$)
 Low-income countries US$ 0.74 ICAN [62] US$ 0.74 ICAN [62]
 Middle-income countries US$ 2.02 ICAN [62] US$ 2.02 ICAN [62]

*Additional file 1: Table S9 [16, 50]