Table 5.
Comparison of Logistic Regression Estimated Associations Between Frailty Measures (Mod-FP or FFP) and Falls
| Phenotype | Fall versus No Fall | Recurrent (≥2 Falls) versus No Fall |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI), p-Value | OR (95% CI), p-Value | |
| Everyone,a n = 253 | ||
| Mod-FP score | 1.36 (1.02, 1.81), 0.04 | 1.56 (1.07, 2.28), 0.02 |
| FFP score | 1.63 (1.22,2.18), <0.01 | 1.76 (1.23,2.51), <0.01 |
| <55 years,b n = 144 | ||
| Mod-FP score | 1.09 (0.72, 1.63), 0.69 | |
| FFP score | 1.41 (0.99, 1.99), 0.053 | |
| ≥55 years,b n = 109 | ||
| Mod-FP score | 1.76 (1.15, 2.68), 0.01 | |
| FFP score | 2.07 (1.26,3.41), <0.01 | |
Note. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; FFP = Fried’s frailty phenotype; Mod-FP = modified Fried phenotype; OR = odds ratio.
a
Adjusted for age and gender at birth.
b
Adjusted for gender at birth.