TABLE 2.

An overview of identified studies on cross‐sector chronic wound improvement perspectives and associated connections to dimensions of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework discussed in Section 5

Identified cross‐sector studies and SEIPS framework connections
Authors, year, and title	Findings related to SEIPS	SEIPS dimension(s) identified
Barrett, M. et al. (2009). Challenges faced in implementation of a telehealth enabled chronic wound care system	Major barriers to TM include workforce shortages/turnover and significant installation delays	TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION
Hofmann‐Wellenhof, R. et al. (2006). Feasibility and acceptance of telemedicine for wound care in patients with chronic leg ulcers	High acceptance of teledermatology amongst patients, home‐care nurses, and wound experts	INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY
Irgens et al. (2019). Hospital based care at home; study protocol for a mixed epidemiological and randomised controlled trial	TM barriers and opportunities related to several wound management factors (quality of life, cost‐benefits, etc.) across hospital and home setting	INDIVIDUAL ORGANISATION
Kong, L. Y. et al. (2021). A 57‐year‐old man with type 1 diabetes mellitus and a chronic foot ulcer successfully managed with a remote patient‐facing wound care smartphone application	Patients found the technology “educational and empowering” with increased self‐examination and engagement in preventive behaviour	INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY
Kolltveit, B.H. et al. (2018). Telemedicine follow‐up facilitates more comprehensive diabetes foot ulcer care: A qualitative study in home‐based and specialist health care	Identified barriers related to structures (need for time and resources) and equipment (need for updated equipment)	TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION
Mills, E.C. et al. (2020). Telemedicine and the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Are we ready to go live?	Identified systemic TM benefits related to individual satisfaction, technology advancement and safety aspects at organisational level	INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION
Rasmussen, B.S. et al. (2015). A qualitative study of the key factors in implementing telemedical monitoring of diabetic foot ulcer patients	Management, training, economy, and work absence represent key influences on TM implementation	INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION
Smith‐Strøm et al. (2016). An integrated wound‐care pathway, supported by telemedicine, and competent wound management ‐ Essential in follow‐up care of adults with diabetic foot ulcers	Patients perceive health care competence and professional skills as crucial to functioning TM	INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY

Note: For full publication details, see the “references” section.