Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;150(3):248–261. doi: 10.1017/S0031182022001688

Table 2.

Top significant negative correlations between parabasalid and bacterial genera by sparCC analysis

Parasite genus Bacterial genus Bacterial phylum Bacterial Gram stain Correlation coefficient P value
Tetratrichomonas Leeuwenhoekiella Bacteroidetes −0.824 0.00
Algibacter Bacteroidetes −0.800 0.00
Desulfocapsa Proteobacteria −0.793 0.00
Veillonella Firmicutes −0.790 0.01
Desulfitobacterium Firmicutes + −0.784 0.00
Alteromonas Proteobacteria −0.765 0.00
Emticicia Bacteroidetes −0.751 0.00
Xenorhabdus Proteobacteria −0.740 0.01
Prevotella Bacteroidetes −0.721 0.00
Psychrobacter Proteobacteria −0.718 0.00
Pentatrichomonas Basfia Proteobacteria −0.735 0.00
Gemella Firmicutes +/− −0.675 0.00
Moraxella Proteobacteria −0.639 0.03
Avibacterium Proteobacteria −0.638 0.00
Acidaminococcus Firmicutes −0.635 0.05
Roseburia Firmicutes + −0.630 0.03
Aggregatibacter Proteobacteria −0.617 0.04
Mannheimia Proteobacteria −0.614 0.03
Chania Proteobacteria −0.614 0.04
Thalassospira Proteobacteria −0.610 0.05
Trichomitus Dickeya Proteobacteria −0.696 0.00
Kocuria Actinobacteria +/− −0.689 0.02
Amycolatopsis Actinobacteria + −0.633 0.05
Aerococcus Firmicutes + −0.614 0.03
Prochlorococcus Cyanobacteria −0.545 0.04
Phascolarctobacterium Firmicutes −0.527 0.05
Pseudonocardia Actinobacteria + −0.525 0.05
Desulfosporosinus Firmicutes + −0.508 0.05