Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;50(2):76–87. doi: 10.1159/000528261

Table 2.

Immunoadsorption treatment plan

Patient number Baseline titer
IA sessions planned IA sessions performed Mean PV treated per IA session Titer at transplantation
IgG IgM IgG IgM
1 128 32 6 6 2.5 2 2
2 32 32 5 5 2.2** neg 4
3 32 32 5 5 2.5 4 4
4 16 16 5 5 2.5 neg 2
5 32 32 5 5 2.5 neg 2
6 256 16 7 5 2.5 2 1
7 32 8 5 5 2.4 neg 1
8* 16 2 4 6 3.3 2 1
9 4 16 4 4 3 neg 4
10* 256 16 6 10 3.4 8 1
11 256 32 6 6 3.3 4 neg
12* 128 16 6 3*** 4 4 1
13 64 16 6 4**** 2.5 4 neg

Isohemagglutinin titers for IgG and IgM at baseline were considered to plan the number of IA sessions based on the estimation that one IA session was able to lower isohemagglutinins by one titer level. For logistical reasons, a margin was used at the discretion of the treating nephrologist. Generally, 2.5 patient's plasma volumes (PV) were processed per IA session. This was increased up to 4 plasma volumes per session if the titer reduction was insufficient. IA, immunoadsorption; PV, plasma volumes (calculated with the formula of Nadler).

*

In 3 patients, in response to insufficient titer lowering the processed PV per IA session was increased and the transplant postponed.

**

Last IA was interrupted because of clumping in the filter.

***

Because of low blood pressure during IA and hemodialysis, anticoagulation was switched from ACD-A to heparin after 7 IA sessions to facilitate higher flow rates. Sessions with citrate anticoagulation are not included in the analysis.

****

Two plasma exchange sessions (not included in the analysis) were performed before switching to IA heparin for logistical reasons as the Glycosorb column was not available on time.