Skip to main content
letter
. 2023 Jan 31;7(1):4–12. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrac004

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Ratios of X/A substitution rates (R) for sexually antagonistic mutations carrying male advantage and female disadvantage (Nesm = 3, Nesf = −3) (A) and mutations carrying female advantage and male disadvantage Nesm = −3, Nesf = 3 (B) plotted along the R for mutations with equal effects in males and females, as a function of dominance coefficient, h.