Summary of findings 7. Paroxetine compared with duloxetine for depression.
Paroxetine compared with duloxetine for depression | ||||||
Patient or population: patients with depression Settings: in‐ and out‐patients Intervention: paroxetine Comparison: duloxetine | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of Participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
Duloxetine | Paroxetine | |||||
Failure to respond at endpoint (6‐12 weeks) | 459 per 1000 | 431 per 1000 (373 to 492) | OR 0.89 (0.70 to 1.14) | 1821 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | |
Failure to respond at 1‐4 weeks | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 0 (0) | See comment | No trial reported this outcome. |
Failure to respond at 16‐24 weeks | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 0 (0) | See comment | No trial reported this outcome. |
Failure to remit at endpoint | 592 per 1000 | 587 per 1000 (537 to 633) | OR 0.98 (0.80 to 1.19) | 1821 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | |
SMD at endpoint | The mean SMD at endpoint in the intervention groups was 0.04 standard deviations higher (0.06 lower to 0.15 higher) | 1481 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | This effect approaches zero. | ||
Failure to complete ‐ any cause ‐ | 237 per 1000 | 232 per 1000 (193 to 277) | OR 0.97 (0.77 to 1.23) | 1821 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | |
Participants with at least some Side Effects | 700 per 1000 | 654 per 1000 (599 to 702) | OR 0.81 (0.64 to 1.01) | 1870 (6 studies) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | |
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; SMD: standardized mean difference; OR: Odds ratio; | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
1 Blinding stated but not tested. No information on randomisation procedures and allocation concealment.