Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

Comparison 24. SE ‐ Asthenia.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Paroxetine versus older ADs 17   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 versus amitriptyline 5 779 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.12, 1.55]
1.2 versus dothiepin 2 405 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.58 [0.30, 8.47]
1.3 versus imipramine 6 680 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.73, 2.28]
1.4 versus lofepramine 1 122 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.36 [0.47, 40.16]
1.5 versus maprolitine 3 429 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.49, 1.16]
2 Paroxetine versus other SSRIs 7   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 versus citalopram 1 406 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.33, 1.04]
2.2 versus fluoxetine 5 1680 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.91, 1.77]
2.3 versus fluvoxamine 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.13, 1.95]
3 Paroxetine versus newer ADs 13   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 versus aprepitant (MK‐869) 1 143 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.47 [0.61, 3.58]
3.2 versus bupropion 1 140 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.25 [0.87, 20.80]
3.3 versus duloxetine 3 1006 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.45, 1.38]
3.4 versus nefazodone 2 246 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [0.36, 3.62]
3.5 versus reboxetine 3 1375 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.07 [1.19, 3.60]
3.6 versus tianeptine 1 277 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.06, 16.03]
3.7 versus venlafaxine 1 361 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.46 [0.17, 1.23]
3.8 versus trazodone 1 108 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.17 [0.13, 79.60]