Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

Comparison 28. SE ‐ Cardiovascular system.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Syncope 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 versus maprolitine 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.21, 6.27]
2 NOS 8 693 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.41, 1.31]
2.1 versus amitriptyline 3 242 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.24, 4.31]
2.2 versus clomipramine 1 83 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.20, 2.40]
2.3 versus fluoxetine 1 242 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.32, 2.28]
2.4 versus mianserin 3 126 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.24 [0.05, 1.06]