Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

Comparison 30. SE ‐ Confusion.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Paroxetine versus older ADs 5 738 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.18, 1.30]
1.1 versus amitriptyline 1 153 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.13, 7.00]
1.2 versus clomipramine 1 92 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.14, 7.76]
1.3 versus dothiepin 1 271 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.14 [0.02, 1.12]
1.4 versus lofepramine 1 106 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.01, 3.53]
1.5 versus mianserin 1 116 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.05, 6.42]
2 Paroxetine versus newer or non‐conventional ADs 3   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 versus nefazodone 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.75 [0.48, 46.91]
2.2 versus reboxetine 2 1050 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.58 [0.20, 12.39]