Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

Comparison 38. SE ‐ Dry mouth.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Paroxetine versus older ADs 29 4578 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.23 [0.18, 0.30]
1.1 versus amitriptyline 12 1576 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.27 [0.17, 0.43]
1.2 versus clomipramine 2 1111 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.26, 0.48]
1.3 versus dothiepin 2 405 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.10, 0.50]
1.4 versus imipramine 8 835 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.16 [0.10, 0.26]
1.5 versus lofepramine 1 106 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.25, 5.44]
1.6 versus maprolitine 3 429 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.13 [0.08, 0.23]
1.7 versus mianserin 1 116 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.12, 4.70]
2 Paroxetine versus other SSRIs 11   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 versus citalopram 1 406 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.56, 1.68]
2.2 versus escitalopram 1 454 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.44 [0.74, 2.83]
2.3 versus fluoxetine 6 1920 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.67 [1.17, 2.38]
2.4 versus fluvoxamine 1 60 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.21, 1.88]
2.5 versus sertraline 2 545 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.52, 1.99]
3 Paroxetine versus newer or non‐conventional ADs 22   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 versus agomelatine 1 284 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.79 [0.55, 41.52]
3.2 versus aprepitant (MK‐869) 1 143 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.30, 3.21]
3.3 versus bupropion 2 240 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.27, 1.87]
3.4 versus duloxetine 5 1571 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.55, 1.10]
3.5 versus hypericum 1 251 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.62 [1.36, 5.04]
3.6 versus mirtazapine 3 726 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.27, 1.24]
3.7 versus nefazodone 2 246 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.35, 1.82]
3.8 versus reboxetine 3 1375 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.27, 0.45]
3.9 versus tianeptine 1 277 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.22, 2.26]
3.10 versus trazodone 1 108 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 10.09 [0.53, 192.17]
3.11 versus venlafaxine 2 466 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.44, 3.06]