Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

Comparison 78. SE ‐ Sleep disorders.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Paroxetine versus older ADs 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 versus imipramine 1 159 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.12, 2.02]
1.2 versus mianserin 1 116 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.02, 9.43]
2 Paroxetine versus newer or non‐conventional ADs 9   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 versus duloxetine 2 538 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.92 [0.70, 12.22]
2.2 versus hypericum 1 251 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.07 [0.69, 6.24]
2.3 versus mirtazapine 2 451 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.54, 3.95]
2.4 versus reboxetine 3 1375 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [1.04, 9.43]
2.5 versus trazodone 1 108 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.01, 2.04]