Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

29060/356.

Methods Eight‐week, double‐blind, multicentre, randomised, comparative study.
Participants Moderate to moderately severe depression with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (DSM‐III‐R), male or female at least 18 years old, inpatients or outpatients with a Hamilton rating scale for depression (HDRS‐17) total score 18 or more, HAMD‐10 of 1 or more.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 68 participants.
 Paroxetine: 70 participants.
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day.
 Paroxetine dose: 20 mg/day.
Outcomes HDRS, Hamilton rating scale for anxiety (HAM‐A), Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Total dropout, dropout due to side effects, dropout due to inefficacy. Number of patients experiencing at least one side effect, side‐effect profile.
Notes Funding: paroxetine manufacturer.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized". No further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind". No further details.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind". No further details.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population consisted of all subjects randomized to active treatment and for whom one valid post‐randomization evaluation was available. Per Protocol (PP) population consisted of all subjects who had no major protocol violation with regard to inclusion/exclusion criteria, duration of treatment was at least 42 days, and no major protocol violation occurred during the first 2 weeks of active treatment. Safety population consisted of all subjects who were randomized to treatment. Primary efficacy analysis was based on both ITT and PP population".
More than 20% of participants abandoned the study prematurely.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes data were reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out.