Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD006531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2

CL3‐023.

Methods Double‐blind, randomised study.
Participants Male and female adults, 18‐70 years of age, with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM‐IV criteria. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total score > or = 22 at screening and baseline.
Interventions Paroxetine: 20 mg/day.
Agomelatine: 25 mg/day.
Outcomes Change from baseline to endpoint at HDRS, remission, sexual functions.
Notes Funding: by industry.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "The randomisation of treatments (agomelatine, placebo, fluoxetine or paroxetine) was non‐adaptive, non‐centralised, and balanced with a 1:1:1 ratio. There was no stratification and permutation blocks were of fixed size = 6".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind. Quote: "Agomelatine, placebo and fluoxetine (or paroxetine) were disguised in tablets or capsules (or tablets) of identical appearance and taste".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind. Quote: "Agomelatine, placebo and fluoxetine (or paroxetine) were disguised in tablets or capsules (or tablets) of identical appearance and taste".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Other bias Unclear risk Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out.