CL3‐023.
Methods | Double‐blind, randomised study. | |
Participants | Male and female adults, 18‐70 years of age, with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM‐IV criteria. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total score > or = 22 at screening and baseline. | |
Interventions | Paroxetine: 20 mg/day. Agomelatine: 25 mg/day. |
|
Outcomes | Change from baseline to endpoint at HDRS, remission, sexual functions. | |
Notes | Funding: by industry. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The randomisation of treatments (agomelatine, placebo, fluoxetine or paroxetine) was non‐adaptive, non‐centralised, and balanced with a 1:1:1 ratio. There was no stratification and permutation blocks were of fixed size = 6". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double blind. Quote: "Agomelatine, placebo and fluoxetine (or paroxetine) were disguised in tablets or capsules (or tablets) of identical appearance and taste". |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double blind. Quote: "Agomelatine, placebo and fluoxetine (or paroxetine) were disguised in tablets or capsules (or tablets) of identical appearance and taste". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out. |