Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 27;152(6):1150–1158. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34316

TABLE 3.

Rate ratio of breast cancer incidence by BI‐RADS density code at first screen in recruitment period, Capital Region, Denmark, 2012 to 2020

BI‐RADS Rate ratio adjusted by running age, 95% confidence interval (in parentheses)
Person‐years a Breast cancer cases a Follow‐up time
Total Total Total BC/PY 0‐<2 y 2‐<5 y 5+ y
Code 1 351 823 888

1 (baseline)

888/351 823

1 (baseline)

335/3549

1 (baseline)

428/48 453

1 (baseline)

125/299 821

Code 2 407 704 1684

1.69 (1.56‐1.84)

1684/407 704

1.83 (1.60‐2.09)

676/6131

1.53 (1.36‐1.72) b

761/65 809

1.69 (1.36‐2.09)

247/335 764

Code 3 256 681 1265

2.06 (1.89‐2.25)

1265/256 681

2.02 (1.75‐2.32)

468/4510

2.04 (1.80‐2.32)

578/47 309

2.36 (1.89‐2.95)

219/204 863

Code 4 47 954 256

2.37 (2.05‐2.74)

256/47 954

2.60 (2.07‐3.26)

107/1037

1.84 (1.50‐2.26) b

113/11 649

2.61 (1.79‐3.82)

36/35 268

Note: Total and by length of follow‐up. Adjusted by running age in 5‐years age groups.

Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer/ductal carcinoma in situ; PY, person‐years.

a

3131 person‐years and 17 breast cancer cases had missing BI‐RADS density code.

b

Crude rate ratio, as the model did not converge due to collinearity, but this means also that age‐adjustment would not change the estimate.