Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;83(1):109–118. doi: 10.1002/pros.24442

Table 3.

AUC of the radiomics score and prediction nomograms

Training cohort (n = 137) Validation cohort (n = 59)
AUC (95% CI) p value AUC (95% CI) p value
Rad‐score 0.703 (0.614, 0.792) 0.745 (0.620, 0.871)
Clin‐nom 0.751 (0.662, 0.839) 0.752 (0.618, 0.886)
Int‐nom 0.815 (0.737, 0.893) 0.835 (0.729, 0.941)
Rad‐score vs. Clin‐nom 0.5 0.9
Rad‐score vs. Int‐nom 0.006 0.2
Clin‐nom vs. Int‐nom 0.04 0.04

Note: Clinical nomogram, combined with age, tPSA, and prostate volume; Integrated nomogram, combined with age, tPSA, prostate volume, and radiomics score.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; Clin‐nom, clinical nomogram; Int‐nom, integrated nomogram; Rad‐score, radiomics score.