Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;69(6):3637–3650. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14734

TABLE 4.

Summary of results obtained in cross‐validation tests

Serological positive evidence
N. pos iELISA/N. tested N. pos cELISA/N. iELISA‐pos N. pos IFT/N. iELISA‐pos N. pos (cELISA, IFT and iELISA)/N. sera tested by the 3 methods
Old sera 12/26 (46.2%) 2/8 (25%) 8/8 (100%) 2/8 (25.0%)
Recent sera 23/62 (37.1%) 13/13 (100%) 10/10 (100%) 10/28 (35.7%)
Total 35/88 (39.8%) 15/21 (71.4%) 18/18 (100%) 12/36 (33.3%)
Serological negative evidence
N. neg iELISA/N. tested N. neg cELISA/N. iELISA‐neg N. neg IFT/N. iELISA‐neg N. neg (cELISA & IFT& iELISA)/N. sera tested by the 3 methods
Old sera 14/26 (53.8%) 14/14 (100.0%) 3/4 (75%) 3/8 (37.5%)
Recent sera 39/62 (62.9%) 20/28 (71.4%) 17/26 (65.4%) 9/28 (32.1%)
Total 53/88 (60.2%) 34/40 (85%) 20/30 (66.7%) 12/36 (33.3%)

Doubtful results were excluded from the analysis.