Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;15(12):2265–2295. doi: 10.1002/aur.2826

TABLE 3.

Summary of studies examining the relationship between cognitive inflexibility (CI) in children and adolescents with ASD and internalizing symptoms (n = 21)

Author (year); country ASD diagnosis (criteria; measure) N (male) Age (years; M, SD); IQ (M, SD) Cognitive flexibility (CF) measure Internalizing (INT) symptom measure Main findings Quality score
Carter Leno et al. (2022); Canada DSM‐IV‐TR; ADOS; ADI‐R

ASD: 242 (204)

Typical shifting: 144

Atypical shifting: 98

Age:

T1: 3.46

T5: 7.77

T6: 8.73

T7: 9.71

T8: 10.77

FSIQ (T6):

Typical shifting: 86.55 (18.96)

Atypical shifting: 82.70 (19.21)

BRIEF‐Shift (parent) CBCL–internalizing (teacher)

Confounding variables controlled for: family income and autism symptom severity

Cognitive Inflexibility and INT:

Atypical Shifting vs. Typical Shifting: Greater CI significantly moderated the relationship between family‐stressful life events (F‐SLE) and future internalizing problems only in the group with atypical shifting abilities

0.79
Dieckhaus et al. (2021); USA

DSM‐5;

ASD: ADOS‐2; ADHD: MINI‐Kid.

ASD: 35 (35)

ADHD: 83 (63)

Age:

ASD: 9.85 (0.88)

ADHD: 9.56 (0.87)

FSIQ:

ASD: 101.63 (13.88)

ADHD: 97.54 (15.02)

BRIEF‐Shift (Parent) CBCL – Anxiety (Parent)

Confounding variables controlled for: gender and ethnoracial identity

CI: 54% of ASD and 46% of ADHD group showed clinically elevated scores on Shift subscale (greater CI)

INT: 51% of ASD and 36% of ADHD group showed clinically elevated anxiety problems on CBCL

CI and INT: In both ASD and ADHD groups – greater CI associated with greater anxiety scores (ASD: Spearman's rho = 0.61, p < 0.001; ADHD: Spearman's rho = 0.60, p < 0.001)

0.82
Hollocks et al. (2022); UK ICD‐10; ADOS‐2, ADI‐R ASD: 81 (74)

Age:

Wave 2: 15.4 (0.45)

Wave 3: 23.2 (0.79)

FSIQ (Wave 2): 83.5 (17.8)

WASI–Block Design

Opposite Words

Trail Making

WCST (Performance‐based)

SDQ–emotional problems (parent–wave 2)

BAI (parent–wave 3)

BDI (parent–wave 3)

Confounding variables controlled for: verbal IQ, restricted and repetitive behaviors

CI and INT (Age 16): CI significantly associated with increased emotional problems

CI and INT (Age 23): greater CI at age 16 predicted greater anxiety and depression at age 23. CI partially mediated the relationship between anxiety, depression and emotional problems between age 16 and 23

0.83
* Ozsivadjian et al. (2021); UK DSM‐5; DAWBA ASD: 95 (71)

Age: 11 (3.2)

FSIQ: (n = 59) 98.5 (2.3)

FS‐R (Parent)

RCADS ‐ Total (Parent)

SDQ–emotional problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: autism symptom severity

CI and INT: CI positively associated with RCADS total (r = 0.39) and SDQ‐E (r = 0.34). CI did not significantly predict internalizing symptoms. CI significantly predicted higher intolerance of uncertainty (β =0.73, SE = 0.09; p ≤ 0.01)

0.91
Uljarevic et al. (2022); Australia

DSM‐5; ADI‐R;

ADOS‐2.

PTEN‐ASD: 38 (30)

Macro‐ASD: 25 (21)

PTEN no ASD: 23 (15)

Age:

PTEN‐ASD: 8.93 (4.75)

Macro‐ASD: 11.99 (5.15)

PTEN‐no ASD: 8.94 (4.85)

FSIQ:

PTEN‐ASD: 66.32 (13.71)

Macro‐ASD: 74.30 (24.50)

PTEN‐no ASD: 99.14 (17.40)

BRIEF–shift (parent) CBCL 1.5–5/6–18–anxiety (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: FSIQ

CIs: Macro‐ASD group > PTEN‐no ASD group.

CI and INT: Over the whole sample: there is a significant positive correlation between CI and anxiety (r = 0.53, p < 0.01).

0.86
*Crawley et al. (2020); UK ADI‐R; ADOS.

ASD: 321 (232)

NT: 251 (171)

Age:

ASD: 16.67 (5.92)

NT: 16.93 (6.02)

FSIQ:

ASD: 103.6 (15.28)

NT: 108.95 (12.82)

Probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) (Performance‐based)

BAI (parent for children; self for adolescents); BYI‐II–anxiety (parent for children; self for adolescents)

Confounding variable controlled for: IQ, restricted and repetitive behavior

CI: ASD < NT on task accuracy; ASD > NT on number of perseverative errors (greater CI)

CI and INT: in ASD children, perseverative errors positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.34)

1
* Sesso et al. (2020); Italy

DSM‐5;

K‐SADS‐PL; ADI‐R;

ADOS.

ADHD: 64 (56)

ADHD + ASD: 19 (18)

ADHD + ODD/CD: 43 (39)

ADHD + ASD + ODD/CD: 25 (24)

Age:

ADHD: 10.02 (2.49)

ADHD + ASD: 9.58 (2.69)

ADHD + ODD/CD: 9.37 (2.95)

ADHD + ASD + ODD/CD: 8.4 (2.24)

FSIQ:

ADHD: 93 (14.98)

ADHD + ASD: 92.69 (17)

ADHD + ODD/CD: 96.86 (16.05)

ADHD + ASD + ODD/CD: 98.94 (18.06)

BRIEF‐2 shift (parent) CBCL 6–18‐internalizing problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: none

CI: no significant between‐group differences

CI and INT: Items from the Shift (BRIEF) subscale and internalizing symptoms (CBCL) loaded onto the same principal component factor. For ASD group, there was a positive correlation between CI and internalizing problems ( r = 0 .51, p = 0.04)

0.91
Trimarco et al. (2020); Italy DSM‐5; ADOS‐2

ASD: 21 (4)

PKU: 15 (8)

Control: 14 (6)

Age:

ASD: 9.83 (1.95)

PKU: 10.26 (2.26)

NT: 10.20 (1.99)

FSIQ:

ASD: 94.33 (18.94)

PKU: 95.47 (12.50)

NEPSY‐II: Switching, Response Set, Animal Sorting, Design Fluency (Performance‐based) CBCL 6–18 internalizing problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: none

CI: ASD < NT group on design fluency and response set. No differences on switching tasks across PKU, ASD and NT groups

INT: ASD > NT and PKU groups

0.73
Dajani et al. (2016); USA ASD: ADOS‐G; ADOS‐2; ADI‐R; ADHD: DICA‐IV; CPRS‐R:L.

ASD: 24 (18)

ADHD: 31 (22)

NT: 44 (31)

Age:

ASD: 10.30 (1.44)

ADHD: 9.74 (1.24)

NT: 10.47 (1.03)

FSIQ:

ASD: 102.48 (12.3)

ADHD: 109.68 (12.64)

NT: 119.66 (13.21)

BRIEF–shift (parent) CBCL 6–18 internalizing problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: head motion

CI: weaker left SPL to right SPL connectivity is related to greater CI and worse emotional control in children

0.82
Berenguer et al. (2018); Spain

DSM‐5;

ASD: SCQ; ADI‐R

ADHD: SDQ

ASD: 30 (27)

ADHD: 35 (32)

ASD + ADHD: 22 (21)

NT: 37 (23)

Age:

ASD: 8.39 (1.3)

ADHD: 9.14 (1.4)

ASD + ADHD: 8.86 (1.3)

NT: 8.54 (1.2)

FSIQ:

ASD: 100.37 (12.4)

ADHD: 99.03 (9.8)

ASD + ADHD: 102.86 (13.0)

NT: 102.11 (8.9)

BRIEF–BRI (Teacher) SDQ emotional problems (parents)

Confounding variables controlled for: sex, vocabulary and educational level of parents

CI: ASD + ADHD > ASD, ADHD > NT

INT: ASD, ADHD, ASD + ADHD > NT

0.86
*Gardiner et al. (2018); Canada

DSM‐IV‐TR; ADI‐R;

ADOS.

ASD: 59 (51)

NT: 67 (33)

Age:

ASD: 10.07 (2.09)

NT: 9.44 (1.73)

FSIQ:

ASD: 107.47 (13.25)

NT: 111.37 (12.78)

BRIEF–shift (parent) BASC‐2–internalizing behaviors (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: IQ

CI: ASD > NT

INT: ASD > NT on depression symptoms

CI and INT: No significant association between CI and anxiety; For the ASD group ‐ shift (β = 0.35, p = 0.02) and emotional control (β = 0.37, p = 0.03) scales emerged as unique significant contributors towards depression symptom severity. Greater CI also was associated with greater internalizing symptoms (r = 0.54)

0.91
* Vogan et al. (2018); Canada

ADOS/

ADOS‐2

ASD: 39 (34)

NT: 34 (20)

Age:

ASD: 10.6 (1.8)

NT: 11.2 (2.1)

FSIQ:

ASD: 103.3 (14.7)

NT: 115.4 (11.7)

BRIEF–BRI (parent) CBCL–anxious/depressed (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: age

CI and INT: ASD group–Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) from BRIEF showed significant correlation with anxiety/depression symptom severity ( r = 0.45 , p < 0.01) rated 2 years later. Regression analyses showed that more BRI problems at T1 predicted later symptoms of anxiety/depression (p < 0.01) at T2 (18% of variance)

0.82
*Lieb et al. (2017); USA DSM‐IV‐TR ASD: 127 (103) Age: 13.95 (1.6) BRIEF–shift (parent)

CBCL–depression (parent)

YSR‐depression (self)

Confounding variables controlled for: age, gender, mode of participation

CI and INT: CI positively associated with CBCL‐D ( r = 0.46 , p < 0.01) and YSR‐D (r = 0.34, p < 0.01)

0.86
Dajani et al. (2016); USA ASD: ADOS‐G; ADOS‐2; ADI‐R; ADHD: DICA‐IV; CPRS‐R:L.

ASD: 30 (23)

ADHD: 93 (72)

ASD + ADHD: 66 (55)

NT: 128 (98)

Age:

ASD: 9.76 (1.36)

ADHD: 9.79 (1.21)

ASD + ADHD: 10.45 (1.40)

NT: 10.03 (1.18)

FSIQ:

ASD: 106.10 (14.88)

ADHD: 107.31 (11.67)

ASD + ADHD: 99.99 (15.98)

NT: 115.76 (12.23)

BRIEF (Parent)

NEPSY‐II Statue subtest

WISC‐IV Backward Digit Span (Performance‐based)

CBCL 6–18–Anxiety/Depression (Parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: diagnosis

CI: ASD primarily in the “impaired” class for executive function (78%) (including 47% of children with ASD only, and 92% of children with both ASD and ADHD), with 20% in the “average” class.

CI and INT: Socioemotional problems (i.e., including highest level of anxiety and depression) based on EF profile: “impaired” EF > “average” EF > “above average” EF

0.86
* Andersen et al. (2015); Norway K‐SADS‐PL

ASD: 34 (28)

NT: 45 (29)

Age:

ASD: 11.6 (2.0)

NT: 11.4 (1.5)

FSIQ:

ASD: 99.9 (17.4)

NT: 104.5 (13.1)

CW4 (Performance‐based) CBCL–Internalizing Problems (Parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: age

CI: ASD > NT group, both showed similar rates of improvement over time.

INT: ASD > NT on depression symptoms. ASD group showed improvement over time.

CI and INT: Neither group showed any significant correlation between changes in flexibility and changes in depression. At baseline, greater internalizing symptoms was associated with greater CI ( r = 0.47 ).

0.77
Lawson et al. (2015); USA

DSM‐IV‐TR;

ASD: ADI‐R; ADOS;

ADHD: ADHD Rating Scale‐IV

ASD: 70 (63)

ADHD: 55 (39)

Age:

ASD: 10.07 (1.77)

ADHD: 8.93 (2.69)

FSIQ:

ASD: 107.01 (19)

ADHD: 111.53 (16.85)

BRIEF–Shift (Parent) CBCL–Anxiety/Depression (Parent)

Confounding variables controlled for: age, gender

CI: ASD > ADHD group.

CI and INT: Across the whole sample, CI is positively associated with Anxious/Depressed (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) scale. Greater CI is also associated with higher anxious/depressed symptoms in the ASD group (B = 0.288, p < 0.001)

0.91
* Hollocks et al. (2014); UK

ICD‐10; ADI‐R; ADOS;

SCQ.

ASD: 90 (82)

Age: 15.5. (0.47)

FSIQ: 84.5 (17.2)

Card Sorting Task ‐ adapted from WCST (Performance‐based) SDQ ‐ Emotional Symptoms (Parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: age

CI and INT: Poorer card sorting task performance was associated with greater anxiety (r = −0.24 , p < 0.05) and greater depression (r = −0.23, p < 0.05)

0.91
Tachibana et al. (2013); Japan DSM‐IV‐TR

ASD: 11 (8)

[Intervention group: 6 (4); Control group: 5 (4)]

Age:

ASD: 9.24 (0.82)

[Intervention: 8.93 (0.71); Control: 9.62 (0.84)]

FSIQ:

ASD: 93.36 (13.20)

[Intervention: 92.67 (15.66); Control: 94.20 (11.30)]

WCST (Performance‐based) CBCL–Anxiety/Depression (Parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: none

CI: intervention group showed significant improvement in number of “perseverative errors” and “categories achieved” on WCST compared to control group

INT: Intervention group showed significant improvement on depression/anxiety symptom severity compared to controls

0.67
Teunisse et al. (2012); The Netherlands DSM‐IV ASD: 20 (20)

Age: 13.7 (1)

FSIQ: 105.5 (13)

WCST‐S,

CANTAB ID/ED (Performance‐based);

BFRS‐R (Parent);

BRIEF–shift (parent)

CBCL/4–18 total problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: none

CI: CANTAB ID/ED and WCST‐S are positively associated (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). Both parent‐based flexibility rating scales are positively associated with each other (r = 0.65, p < 0.01)

CI and Total Problems: Both parent‐based flexibility scales (BFRS‐R, r = 0.51, p < 0.05; BRIEF Shift Score, r = 0.54, p < 0.05) significantly correlated with total problem score on CBCL. Neuropsychological tests did not significantly correlate with CBCL

0.64
* Yerys et al. (2009); USA

DSM‐IV; ADI/ADI‐R; ADOS;

ADHD: Inattentive Type on the DSM‐IV ADHD parent rating scale

ASD: 28 (20)

ASD + ADHD: 21 (18)

NT: 21 (13)

Age:

ASD: 9.7 (2.12)

ASD + ADHD: 9.65 (1.62)

NT:10.3 (1.76)

FSIQ:

ASD: 117.39 (18.68)

ASD + ADHD: 111.24 (13.56)

NT: 116.24 (11.53)

BRIEF‐Shift (Parent) BASC–internalizing problems (parent)

Confounding variable controlled for: none

CI: ASD + ADHD > ASD and NT, ASD group > NT

INT: ASD and ASD + ADHD groups > NT group

CI and INT: ASD and ASD + ADHD groups combined ‐ CI positively associated with internalizing symptoms (r = 0.46)

0.82
Happé et al. (2006); UK DSM‐IV

ASD: 32 (32)

ADHD: 30 (30)

NT: 32 (32)

Age:

ASD: 10.9 (2.4)

ADHD: 11.6 (1.7)

NT: 11.2 (2.0)

FSIQ:

ASD: 99.7 (18.7)

ADHD: 99.1 (17.7)

NT: 106.8 (13.4)

Verbal Fluency;

Design Fluency;

CANTAB ID/ED (Performance‐based)

SDQ Emotional Problems (Parent)

Confounding variables controlled for: age and FSIQ

CI: ASD group: age positively associated with performance on Categories and Design fluency, and ID/ED

CI and INT: Within the ADHD group, partialling out age revealed a significant correlation between Flexibility and SDQ Emotional symptoms (r = −0.56, p = 0.001). There were no associations between SDQ scores and flexibility in ASD or NT group

0.82

Note: *Indicates studies included in meta‐analysis. Statistics in italics and bold are correlations used for meta‐analysis.

Abbreviations: ADHD, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; ADI‐(R), Autism Diagnostic Interview (Revised); ADOS, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; APSD, Antisocial process Screening Device; ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorder; BASC, Behavior Assessment System for Children; BFRS‐R, Behavior Flexibility Rating Scale‐Revised; BRIEF‐(S), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (Shift subscale); CANTAB ID/ED, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Intra/Extra dimensional set shift; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist; CD, Conduct Disorder; CF, Cognitive Flexibility; CI, Cognitive inflexibility; CPRS, Conner's Parent Rating Scale; CU, Callous Unemotional; CW4, Color Word Interference task–condition 4; DAWBA, Development and Wellbeing Assessment; DICA, IV, Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents IV; DSM, Diagnostic Statistical Manual; EXT, Externalizing; FS‐R, The Flexibility Scale‐Revised; FSIQ, Full Scale IQ; ICD, International Classification of Disease; K‐SADS‐PL, Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School‐Age Children–Present and Lifetime version; NEPSY‐II, A Developmental NEuroPSYchological assessment; NT, Neurotypical; ODD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder; PACS, Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms; PKU, Phenylketonuria; RBS‐R, Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised; RCADS, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale; SDQ, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task; WISC, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children.