Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1333. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071333

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis for each technique and FFR >0.8/SESBL >2.

Independent Variable Covariate Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p Value Overall Model Fit (p)
FFR One- vs. two-stent technique 0.6591 0.2849 to 1.5249 0.3300 0.14
Kissing-balloon inflation 2.2018 1.0935 to 4.4334 0.0271
POT 0.8520 0.3038 to 2.3892 0.7607
SESBL One- vs. two-stent technique 0.7260 0.3378 to 1.5604 0.4122 0.74
Kissing-balloon inflation 0.8748 0.4754 to 1.6100 0.6674
POT 0.8429 0.3357 to 2.1167 0.7160

FFR, fractional flow reserve; POT, proximal optimization technique.