Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 24;12(7):2488. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072488

Table 3.

Transit time studies.

Author, Year Study Design Study Population Inclusion Criteria Investigational Product vs. Comparator Main Findings
P. Mainguet, 1977 [17] Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study Patients with ileo-colic disease or resection (n = 18) >3 months of diarrhea Loperamide vs. placebo 4.6 h whole gut transit (loperamide)
2.2 h whole gut transit (placebo)
(p < 0.001)
E.K. Yeoh, 1993 [16] Randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study Patients with chronic radiation enteritis (n = 20) +
Healthy subjects (n = 18)
>14 stools/week Loperamide oxide vs. placebo Loperamide oxide decreased gastric emptying time, and increased small bowel and whole gut transit time compared with placebo
Gastric emptying time decreased with loperamide in healthy subjects
P.A. Cann, 1984 [21] Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study Patients with symptoms of IBS (n = 28) Symptoms (abdominal pain and bowel disturbances) present >6 months and >3 days/week Loperamide vs. placebo Loperamide decreased gastric emptying time, and increased small bowel and whole gut transit time compared with placebo
56 ± 5 h whole gut transit (loperamide)
42 ± 4 h whole gut transit (placebo)
(p < 0.01)
E. Schulte-Frohlinde, 2000 [25] Prospective, open dose–response study Healthy male volunteers (n = 10) No diarrhea Casokefamide vs. placebo Casokefamide showed a trend toward
prolongation of oro–cecal transit time
L. Barrow, 1993 [24] Randomized, cross-over study Healthy subjects (n = 12) Lactulose-induced diarrhea Codeine phosphate Codeine increased mouth-to-ileal and colonic transit time primarily in the ascending colon
5.3 ± 3.2 h whole gut transit (codeine)
2.8 ± 1.0 h whole gut transit (placebo)
(p < 0.02)