Table 3.
Transit time studies.
| Author, Year | Study Design | Study Population | Inclusion Criteria | Investigational Product vs. Comparator | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Mainguet, 1977 [17] | Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study | Patients with ileo-colic disease or resection (n = 18) | >3 months of diarrhea | Loperamide vs. placebo | 4.6 h whole gut transit (loperamide) 2.2 h whole gut transit (placebo) (p < 0.001) |
| E.K. Yeoh, 1993 [16] | Randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study | Patients with chronic radiation enteritis (n = 20) + Healthy subjects (n = 18) |
>14 stools/week | Loperamide oxide vs. placebo | Loperamide oxide decreased gastric emptying time, and increased small bowel and whole gut transit time compared with placebo Gastric emptying time decreased with loperamide in healthy subjects |
| P.A. Cann, 1984 [21] | Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study | Patients with symptoms of IBS (n = 28) | Symptoms (abdominal pain and bowel disturbances) present >6 months and >3 days/week | Loperamide vs. placebo | Loperamide decreased gastric emptying time, and increased small bowel and whole gut transit time compared with placebo 56 ± 5 h whole gut transit (loperamide) 42 ± 4 h whole gut transit (placebo) (p < 0.01) |
| E. Schulte-Frohlinde, 2000 [25] | Prospective, open dose–response study | Healthy male volunteers (n = 10) | No diarrhea | Casokefamide vs. placebo | Casokefamide showed a trend toward prolongation of oro–cecal transit time |
| L. Barrow, 1993 [24] | Randomized, cross-over study | Healthy subjects (n = 12) | Lactulose-induced diarrhea | Codeine phosphate | Codeine increased mouth-to-ileal and colonic transit time primarily in the ascending colon 5.3 ± 3.2 h whole gut transit (codeine) 2.8 ± 1.0 h whole gut transit (placebo) (p < 0.02) |