Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;12(7):2658. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072658

Table 3.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD who improved their phenotype at the end of the study (T1) compared to patients with IBD who maintained a frail phenotype at T1. CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: ulcerative colitis; BMI: body mass index; EIMs: extraintestinal manifestations; ISS: immunosuppressors.

Characteristics at T1 Improved Frail Phenotype (N = 47) Persistence of Frail Phenotype (N = 11) p-Value
Age (years), median [range] 54 [18–71] 59 [27–78] 0.27
Female gender, n (%) 28 (60) 8 (73) 0.07
CD, n (%) 25 (53) 6 (55) 0.88
UC, n (%) 22 (47) 5 (45) 0.88
Duration of disease (months), median [range] 156 [10–624] 180 [24–492] 0.99
BMI (kg/m2), median [range] 24 [15–41] 23.5 [20–33] 0.83
History of EIMs, n (%) 12 (26) 7 (64) 0.03
History of steroid dependence/resistance, n (%) 22 (47) 4 (36) 0.74
Clinically active disease, n (%) 14 (30) 8 (73) <0.0001
Current therapy with steroids, n (%) 4 (9) 0 0.001
Current therapy with biologic agents, n (%) 35 (74) 3 (27) <0.0001
Current therapy with ISS, n (%) 2 (4) 0 0.048
Current therapy with mesalamine, n (%) 31 (66) 7 (64) 0.88
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median [range] 1 [0–5] 3 [0–5] 0.08
Psychiatric diseases, n (%) 9 (19) 2 (18) 0.90
Heart failure, n (%) 1 (2) 0 0.50
Pneumological diseases, n (%) 5 (11) 1 (9) 0.81
Neurodegenerative diseases, n (%) 1 (2) 0 0.50
Post-COVID fatigue, n (%) 1 (2) 1 (9) 0.06