Table 3.
Statistical analysis corresponding to Figure 3d.
| Kruskal–Wallis | Post Dunn test, method ‘Bonferroni’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | χ 2 | df | p-value | Pair | p-value |
| Actin localization index per cytosol | 32.576 | 3 | 3.957e-06 | Apico-basal parts of dividing cells/cytosol | .0000* |
| Lateral parts of dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
| Apico-basal parts of dividing cells/cytosol | .0174* | ||||
| Apico-basal parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
| Apico-basal parts of dividing cells/cytosol | .0004* | ||||
| Lateral parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
| Lateral parts of dividing cells/cytosol | .0149* | ||||
| Apico-basal parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
| Lateral parts of dividing cells/cytosol | .2305 | ||||
| Lateral parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
| Apico-basal parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | .8940 | ||||
| Lateral parts of non-dividing cells/cytosol | |||||
Note: Comparison of all the conditions together using Kruskal–Wallis is reported in the left part of the table, whilst pair comparison after Kruskal–Wallis analysis using post Dunn test, method ‘Bonferroni’, are presented in the right part of the table. *The start highlights results with statistical differences.