Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 31;19(3):e1011036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011036

Table 8. Straw and baselines models experiment on BiComp-DTA for the Davis dataset.

Experiments CI(std) MSE CI loss MSE loss
Straw models S1 0.506 (0.004) 0.794 44% 0.557
S2 0.501 (0.015) 0.811 44% 0.574
S3 0.494 (0.003) 1.289 44% 1.052
Baselines KNN 0.845 (0.002) 0.364 6% 0.127
RF 0.868 (0.001) 0.317 3% 0.080
FC 0.855 (0.003) 2.790 5% 2.553
BiComp-DTA 0.904 (0.001) 0.237 - -

S1, S2, and S3 denote different models, for which, the model training and testing are performed on the shuffled binding affinity values, the model training is performed on the shuffled binding values, and the model testing is performed on the shuffled binding values, respectively. KNN, RF, and FC denote k-nearest neighbors algorithm, random forests, and fully-connected neural network, respectively