Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1988 Aug;45(8):509–515. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.8.509

Work with visual display units in pregnancy.

A D McDonald 1, J C McDonald 1, B Armstrong 1, N Cherry 1, A D Nolin 1, D Robert 1
PMCID: PMC1009643  PMID: 3415916

Abstract

Data from the Montreal survey on occupational factors in pregnancy were used to test the hypothesis that visual display units (VDUs) constitute a hazard to reproduction. Use of a VDU was recorded in 4712 current and 2164 previous pregnancies of women in full time employment at time of conception. After allowance for seven confounding variables, the risk of spontaneous abortion in current pregnancies relative to all working women was 1.19 (90% CI 1.09-1.30) and in previous pregnancies, 0.97. In an analysis by occupational title, in which 60 occupational groups were aggregated into eight categories according to use of VDUs, the relative risk for spontaneous abortion was 1.06 (90% CI 0.8-1.4) in current pregnancies and 1.01 (90% CI 0.7-1.3) in previous pregnancies. This suggests that the small excess of spontaneous abortions among individual women reporting the use of VDUs in current pregnancies may have been due to recall bias. Relative risks for stillbirth, preterm birth, and low birth weight all had 90% confidence limits which included unity. In an analysis of congenital defects the number of pregnancies was increased to include women who worked 15 or more hours a week. In all but one of nine groups of congenital defect examined confidence limits for the relative risk included unity in both current and previous pregnancies. The relative risks for the renal urinary group of defects were raised in both current (1.84, 90% CI 1.07-3.15) and previous pregnancies (1.66, 90% CI 0.82-3.25). There being no prior reason to suspect a causal link with this type of defect, interpretation remains open to question.

Full text

PDF
509

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergqvist U. O. Video display terminals and health. A technical and medical appraisal of the state of the art. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984;10 (Suppl 2):1–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cherry N. Physical demands of work and health complaints among women working late in pregnancy. Ergonomics. 1987 Apr;30(4):689–701. doi: 10.1080/00140138708969761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delgado J. M., Leal J., Monteagudo J. L., Gracia M. G. Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. J Anat. 1982 May;134(Pt 3):533–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kurppa K., Holmberg P. C., Rantala K., Nurminen T., Saxén L. Birth defects and exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy. A Finnish case-referent study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985 Oct;11(5):353–356. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Landrigan P. J., Melius J. M., Rosenberg M. J., Coye M. J., Binkin N. J. Reproductive hazards in the workplace. Development of epidemiologic research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1983 Apr;9(2 Spec No):83–88. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McDonald A. D., Cherry N. M., Delorme C., McDonald J. C. Visual display units and pregnancy: evidence from the Montreal survey. J Occup Med. 1986 Dec;28(12):1226–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C., Armstrong B., Cherry N. M., Côté R., Lavoie J., Nolin A. D., Robert D. Fetal death and work in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Mar;45(3):148–157. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.3.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C., Armstrong B., Cherry N. M., Nolin A. D., Robert D. Prematurity and work in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Jan;45(1):56–62. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C., Armstrong B., Cherry N., Delorme C., D-Nolin A., Robert D. Occupation and pregnancy outcome. Br J Ind Med. 1987 Aug;44(8):521–526. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.8.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Michaelson S. M. Health implications of exposure to radiofrequency/microwave energies. Br J Ind Med. 1982 May;39(2):105–119. doi: 10.1136/oem.39.2.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgenstern H. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health. 1982 Dec;72(12):1336–1344. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.12.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES