Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;13(4):e2909. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2909

TABLE 1.

Characters of primary studies included in the meta‐analysis

Author, year Year a Sampling method Sample Female (%) Age M (SD)/Rang Level Country Measure Score method Criteria of identification QA
Abu Ruz et al. (2018) NR Nonrandom 40 NR NR Both Jordan HADS 0–3

Mild: 8–10

Moderate: 11–14

Severe: 15–21

L‐M
Addonizio (2011) 2010 Nonrandom 367 90.74% 18–64 Master US K10 1–5

Mild: 20–24

Moderate: 25–29

Severe: 30 and over

M‐H
Ahuja and Kumar (2015) 2013 Nonrandom 40 100.00% 20–30 Both NR HAM‐A NR NR L
Aleena et al. (2020) NR Nonrandom 400 50.00% 23+ Doctoral China DASS‐21 0–3 NR M‐H
Allen et al. (2022) 2017 Nonrandom 2683 62.99% 28/20–60 Both US BAI 0–3

Mild: 8–15

Moderate: 16–25

Severe: 26 and over

M‐H
Almasri et al. (2022) 2020 Nonrandom 308 45.13% NR Doctoral US GAD‐7 NR NR L‐M
Al‐Shayea (2014) 2013 NR 79 53.16% 32/25–45 Both Saudi Arabia DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L‐M
Atkinson (2020) 2019 NR 84 100.00% NR Both Australia DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L‐M
Attia and Shata (2013) 2013 NR 155 73.55% 32.18(6.85)/ 22–52 Both Egypt DASS‐21 0–3 NR L‐M
Balakrishnan et al. (2022) 2020 Nonrandom 90 78.89% 20–50 Both US DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L
Barreira et al. (2018) 2017–2018 Nonrandom 510 34.71% 20+ Doctoral US GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Barton and Bulmer (2017) 2010–2017 Nonrandom 4477 59.37% 21+ Both US PHQ‐9 NR NR M‐H
Coakley et al. (2021) 2020 NR 530 NR NR Both US GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Cullinan et al. (2022) 2018 Nonrandom 976 NR NR Both UK DASS‐21 0–3

Mild to moderate: 8–14

Severe to extremely severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Duan et al. (2022) 2020–2021 Nonrandom 342 NR NR Both China ZSAS 1–4

Mild: 50–59

Moderate: 60–69

Severe: 70 and over

M‐H
Eisenberg et al. (2007) 2005 Nonrandom 1662 49.28% 70% were 23–30 Both US PHQ‐9 NR NR L‐M
Ellison et al. (2020) 2018 NR 59 81.36% 25.48/23–36 Doctoral US DASS‐21 0–3 NR L‐M
Evans et al. (2017) NR Nonrandom 2279 70.38% NR 90% doctoral 26 countries GAD‐7 NR NR L‐M
Fang et al. (2019) 2018 NR 3669 57.62% 22–28 Master China GAD‐7 NR Positive symptom: 5 and over L‐M
Garcia‐Williams et al. (2014) 2010 and 2012 Nonrandom 301 77.08% 27.98 (5.903)/18–63 Both US PHQ‐9 0–3 NR L‐M
Ghogare et al. (2021) 2020 Nonrandom 195 71.79% 25–35 Both India DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L‐M
Hoying et al. (2020) 2017–2018 Nonrandom 197 NR 24.5 (4.9) Both US GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

L‐M
Jennifer et al. (2022) 2020 Nonrandom 1916 85.80% 20–45 Both US DASS‐21 NR NR L‐M
Jones‐White et al. (2022) 2017–2018 Random 2582 55.46% 18+ Doctoral US GAD‐2 0–3 Positive symptom: 3 and over M‐H
Kowalczyk et al. (2021) NR NR 528 55.49% 26–30 Doctoral Poland GHQ‐28 0–3 Positive symptom: 28 and over M‐H
Li et al. (2021) 2020 Random 339 82.60% 90% was 21–30 Both China SCL‐90 1–5 Positive symptom: subscale score over 2 H
Liang et al. (2021) 2020 Nonrandom 3137 78.29% NR Both China SAS 1–4

Mild: 50–59

Moderate: 60–69

Severe: over 69

M‐H
Liu et al. (2019) 2017 Nonrandom 325 60.31% 31.1 (5.3)/ 23–47 Doctoral China GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Liu et al. (2020) 2017 NR 1625 54.15% NR Both China GAD‐7 0–3 Positive symptom: 10 and over M‐H
Madhan et al. (2012) 2010 Nonrandom 330 44.85% 26 (1.8)/ 24–34 Master India DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

M‐H
Mazurek Melnyk et al. (2016) 2014–2015 Nonrandom 91 65.93% 25.43/21–51 Both US GAD‐7 0–3 NR L
Milicev et al. (2021) 2018–2019 NR 479 69.31% 31.1 (9.1)/21–73 Both UK GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Negi et al. (2019) NR NR 76 50.00% 21–35 Both India DASS‐21 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L‐M
Peng et al. (2022) 2020–2021 Nonrandom 1410 73.48% 23–26 Both China GAD‐7 0–3 Positive symptom: 10 and over M‐H
Pervez et al. (2021) 2019 and 2020 NR 113 49.56% NR Both US GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

L‐M
Ramadoss and Horn (2022) 2021 NR 99 56.57% NR Doctoral US GAD‐2 0–3 Positive symptom: 3 and over L‐M
Rosenthal et al. (2021) 2020 NR 222 NR 26–40 Both US DASS‐21 0–3 NR L
Shadowen et al. (2019) 2017 Nonrandom 344 NR NR Both US BAI 0–3 Positive symptom: 19 and over L‐M
Shete and Garkal (2015) NR NR 50 66.00% 23–34 Both India DASS‐42 0–3

Mild: 8–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15–19

Extremely severe: 20 and over

L
Talapko et al. (2021) 2021 Random 370 84.32% NR Both Croatia DASS‐21 0–3 NR M‐H
Vuuren et al. (2021) NR NR 108 NR NR Both South Africa ZSAS 0–3

Mild to moderate: 45–59

Severe: 60–74

Extremely severe: 75 and over

L‐M
Wang et al. (2018) 2017 Random 260 44.62% NR Both China SCL‐90 1–5 Positive symptom: subscale score over 2 H
Wang et al. (2020) 2020 Nonrandom 375 NR NR Master China GAD‐7 0–3 Positive symptom: 5 and over L‐M
Wu et al. (2022) 2021 NR 1336 52.40% 20+ Both China ZSAS 1–4 Positive symptom: 50 and over M‐H
Xiao et al. (2020) 2020 NR 313 NR NR Both China GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Yadav et al. (2021) 2020 Nonrandom 409 83.13% 22.10(2.928) Both Nepal GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
Zakeri et al. (2021) 2020 Nonrandom 238 67.23% NR Doctoral US CCAPS‐62 0–4

Moderate: average sub scale‐score 1.22–1.89

Severe: average subscale score over 1.89

L‐M
Zhang et al. (2022) 2021 Random 911 78.59% NR Both China ZSAS 1–4

Mild: 50–59

Moderate: 60–69

Severe: 70 and over

H
Zhou et al. (2018) 2017 Nonrandom 1159 63.76% NR Both China SCL‐90 1–5 Positive symptom: Subscale score over 2 L‐M
Zhou et al. (2021) 2020 NR 1080 NR NR Both China GAD‐7 0–3

Mild: 5–9

Moderate: 10–14

Severe: 15 and over

M‐H
a

The end year of data collection.

NR: not report; QA: quality assessment; L: low quality (0–3 points); L‐M: low to medium quality (4–6 points); M‐H: medium to high quality (7–8 points); H: high quality (9–10 points); HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; K10: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; HAM‐A: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; BAI: Beck Anxiety Inventory; DASS: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; GAD‐7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7‐item; PHQ: Patient Health Questionnaire; SAS: Self‐Rating Anxiety Scale; SCL‐90: Symptom Check List 90; CCAPS‐62: Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms; ZSAS: Zung's Self‐Rating Anxiety Scale; GHQ‐28: General Health Questionnaires.