Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 25;15(7):1596. doi: 10.3390/nu15071596

Table 2.

Description of included studies.

Author Year Sample Size Years Design Methods Population Location U.S. Regions
Barrington and Beresford [44] 2019 2265 x¯ = 43 Randomized Controlled Trial Questionnaire Workers (manufacturing, transportation, utilities, household, and others) Seattle, Washington West
Berryman et al. [66] 2021 10,112 ≥19 Cross-sectional Survey NR Nationwide Nationwide
Close et al. [57] 2016 388 x¯ = 42.4 Cross-sectional Questionnaire Health insurer workers North Carolina Southeast
Cowan et al. [3] 2020 9633 x¯ = 48.3 Cross-sectional Survey NR Nationwide Nationwide
Ebel and Byker [56] 2022 4 Case study Semi-structured Interview Store managers Montana West
Grimes et al. [45] 2018 1834 32–70,
x¯ = 53.2
Prospective Interview African American and White adults Baltimore,
Maryland
Northeast
Hess et al. [69] 2017 x¯ = 5000 NR Cross-sectional Survey Families (household leaders) U.S., non-specified U.S., non-specified
House et al. [47] 2018 92 x¯ = 18.8 Cross-sectional Survey Hispanic college freshmen Austin, Texas Southwest
Kong et al. [53] 2011 123 x¯ = 58 Randomized Controlled Trial Interview Postmenopausal overweight-to-obese women Seattle, Washington West
Kuczmarski et al. [46] 2017 7177 30 to 64,
x¯ = 47
Factorial Cross Interview African American and White adults Baltimore,
Maryland
Northeast
Laska et al. [52] 2011 48 18 to 23 Cross-sectional Survey NR Minneapolis, Minnesota Midwest
Liu et al. [62] 2015 226 18 to 85,
x¯ = 40
Cross-sectional Questionnaire NR Los Angeles, California; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Albuquerque, New Mexico. All regions
Malaeb et al. [51] 2020 20 x¯ = 45.5 Randomized Controlled Trial Smartphone App:
survey
Metabolically healthy, overweight, or obese adults Minneapolis,
Minnesota
Midwest
McCurley et al. [54] 2022 602 x¯ = 43.6 Cross-sectional Survey Hospital employees Boston,
Massachusetts
Northeast
Mills et al. [70] 2011 1099 x¯ = 49.6 Cross-sectional Questionnaire Midlife women Nine metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas U.S., non-specified
Murakami and Livingstone [67] 2015 NR 20 to ≥60 Cross-sectional Survey NR Nationwide Nationwide
Murakami and Livingstone [64] 2016 19,427 ≥20 Cross-sectional Face to face or phone interview General population, excluding pregnant and lactating Nationwide Nationwide
Perrigue et al. [50] 2016 12 18 to 50 Randomized Controlled Trial Self-Report NR Seattle, Washington West
Phan and Chambers [20] 2016 198 18 to 74 Pilot study Survey University faculty, staff, and students Kansas Midwest
Phan and Chambers [48] 2018 100 18 to 74 Cross-sectional Survey NR Manhattan,
Kansas
Midwest
Popp et al. [59] 2021 85 x¯ = 56 Cross-sectional Smartphone App; face to face or phone interview NR New York Northeast
Reid et al. [68] 2014 NR x¯ = 31.7 Cross-sectional Questionnaire NR U.S., non-specified U.S., non-specified
Roe et al. [49] 2020 18 x¯ = 50.8 Cross-sectional Smartphone App: survey NR Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
Southeast
Schwedhelm et al. [58] 2022 420 NR Prospective Questionnaire Pregnant or postpartum females North Carolina Southeast
Shimizu et al. [63] 2010 122 NR Randomized Controlled Trial Survey Undergraduate University Students Northeast Northeast
Taetzsch et al. [60] 2021 229 x¯ = 40.9 Cross-sectional Questionnaire Overweight or obese female dependent of active duty or retired military personnel Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Colorado, and Kentucky Northeast, West, Southeast
Thomas et al. [59] 2013 490 Cross-sectional Online survey NR Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia.
Southeast
Wansink et al. [71] 2010 122 19 to 25 Cross-sectional Interview College students U.S., non-specified U.S., non-specified
Wansink et al. [55] 2013 NR NR Longitudinal Food Purchase Database University Students Ithaca, New York Northeast
Xu et al. [65] 2013 2333 ≥60 Cross-sectional Survey NR Nationwide Nationwide
Zizza et al. [10] 2010 2056 ≥65 Cross-sectional Survey Older adults Nationwide Nationwide