NCT02447991.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group RCT Duration of treatment: maximum of 3 episodes of vestibular migraine Duration of follow‐up: until 3 attacks have been treated; up to 4 years, as required |
|
Participants |
Setting: 2‐centre trial based in the USA at tertiary neurology centres Sample size:
Participant baseline characteristics
Inclusion criteria: Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years. A history that fulfils all criteria for vestibular migraine. Episodes must have a spontaneous onset and resolution without associated hearing loss or interictal neurotologic deficits. Other causes of vestibular symptoms ruled out by appropriate clinical investigations. Current medication list compatible with concomitant medications. Able to maintain a vestibular symptom diary and complete all other study procedures. At least 2 vestibular migraine attacks during the 12‐month observation period. Exclusion criteria: Ménière’s disease. Migraine with brainstem aura (formerly basilar‐type migraine) by ICHD‐3 criteria. Ischaemic heart disease, coronary artery vasospasm, uncontrolled hypertension. History of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. History of using rizatriptan specifically to treat vestibular attacks. History of adverse response to triptans. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements for any reason. Diagnosis of vestibular migraine: International Headache Society criteria for definite vestibular migraine (see Appendix 1) |
|
Interventions |
Intervention (n = 89 randomised, n = 59 completed) Rizatriptan 10 mg capsule to be taken orally during 1 acute episode, until 3 episodes had been treated with the study drug Comparator (n = 45 randomised, n = 35 completed) Placebo capsules (contents not stated) to be taken orally during 1 acute episode, until 3 episodes had been treated with the study drug Background interventions administered to all participants None reported Additional treatments (for migraine prophylaxis or other conditions) were permitted if they had been taken during the run‐in period to the trial and participants were on a stable dose |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes relevant to this review:
Secondary outcomes relevant to this review:
Other outcomes reported in the study:
|
|
Notes |
Research integrity checklist:
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "A randomization scheme will be developed to assign the 120 patients expected to be included in the Treatment Phase to parallel treatment arms in a 2:1 ratio of active drug:placebo." Comment: no information is provided regarding generation of the randomisation sequence. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information regarding how the randomisation process would occur and whether the randomisation list would be adequately concealed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: trial is reported to be blinded to participants and study personnel. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: self‐reported symptoms by blinded participants. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: dropout was 22.2% in the placebo arm and 33.7% in the intervention arm, although some participants did provide partial follow‐up data. This is sufficient to impact the results of the trial, and may introduce the potential for bias in the results. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: outcomes are fully reported on the trial registry website according to the pre‐specified plan. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other concerns identified. |