Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 16;7(4):e10704. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10704

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Population

Men (n = 574) Women (n = 748) p value
Demographics
Age (years) 64 (51, 73) 55 (42, 67) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 27.5 (25.1, 30.1) 27.2 (23.9, 31.8) 0.93
Physical performance
Timed up and go (s) 8.4 (7.4, 9.7) 7.6 (6.5, 9.0) <0.001
Handgrip strength (kg) 38.7 (33.3, 43.7) 24 (19.8, 28.5) <0.001
Gait speed (m/s) 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) N/A
Adverse events
At least 1 fall in last year 83 (14.5%) 201 (26.9%) <0.001
At least 1 fracture in last 5 years 65 (11.3%) 67 (9.0%) 0.17
BMD (g/cm2)
Neck of femur 0.954 (0.864, 1.055) 0.915 (0.816, 1.021) <0.001
Hip 1.043 (0.946, 1.148) 0.970 (0.878, 1.069) <0.001
Lumbar spine 1.298 (1.178, 1.454) 1.205 (1.087, 1.328) <0.001
2.6 cm mid‐thigh ROI 2.018 (1.874, 2.155) 1.654 (1.490, 1.797) <0.001
13 cm mid‐thigh ROI 1.986 (1.859, 2.108) 1.624 (1.490, 1.753) <0.001
Whole thigh ROI 1.608 (1.504, 1.711) 1.393 (1.292, 1.480) <0.001
Lean mass (kg)
ALM 25.8 (23.3, 28.4) 17.5 (15.9, 19.3) <0.001
2.6 cm mid‐thigh ROI 0.42 (0.38, 0.47) 0.31 (0.28, 0.35) <0.001
13 cm mid‐thigh ROI 2.1 (1.9, 2.4) 1.6 (1.4, 1.7) <0.001
Whole thigh ROI 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) 3.7 (3.3, 4.1) <0.001
Lean mass corrected for height2 (kg/m2)
ALM 8.4 (7.8, 9.1) 6.7 (6.2, 7.2) <0.001
2.6 cm mid‐thigh ROI 0.14 (0.13, 0.16) 0.12 (0.11, 0.13) <0.001
13 cm mid‐thigh ROI 0.69 (0.62, 0.76) 0.60 (0.54, 0.66) <0.001
Whole thigh ROI 1.8 (1.6, 1.9) 1.4 (1.3, 1.5) <0.001
Lean mass corrected for BMI (kg/kg/m2)
ALM 0.93 (0.84, 1.05) 0.64 (0.56, 0.72) <0.001
2.6 cm mid‐thigh ROI 0.015 (0.014, 0.018) 0.011 (0.010, 0.013) <0.001
13 cm mid‐thigh ROI 0.076 (0.069, 0.085) 0.056 (0.050, 0.063) <0.001
Whole thigh ROI 0.19 (0.17, 0.22) 0.13 (0.12, 0.15) <0.001

Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range), categorical variables are presented as n (%). Between‐group comparison by rank‐sum test and Fisher's exact test.

ALM = appendicular lean mass.