Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 12;14:2086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x

Fig. 8. Varying the frame of reference for quantitative assessment.

Fig. 8

For this figure, we repeat the evolutionary simulations shown in Fig. 5, and vary the frame of reference R. That is, we explore the impact of the number of possible reputation ranks on cooperation, including the case of binary assessment with two reputation ranks. a We show the cooperation rate in equilibrium for the leading eight norms as the number of reputation ranks increases. We note that for the four successful norms L1, L2, L7, L8, the largest frame of reference does not correspond to the highest cooperation rate. An intermediate number of ranks is the most beneficial. L2 also exhibits a drop in cooperation rate from binary assessment to R = 1 (i.e., 3 reputation ranks). The behavior of the cooperation rates is mainly determined by the behavior of the equilibrium abundance of the eight norms as the frame of reference varies (b). Meanwhile, self-cooperation rates quickly increase to 1 as the frame of reference increases (c), which implies that the leading eight players have a perfectly correlated image of each other once assessment is more nuanced. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 5.