Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 30;11:998588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.998588

Table 4.

Approaches used to assess the certainty of the body of evidence in the systematic reviews.

Title of the systematic review Approach for assessing the body of evidence GRADE assessment (number of outcomes) a
High Moderate Low Very low
Vaccination among HIV-infected, HIV-exposed uninfected and HIV-uninfected children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence related to vaccine efficacy and effectiveness GRADE 4 1 1 3
Prevalence of strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis among migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis GRADE 0 1 4 0
Effects of Housing First approaches on health and wellbeing of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials GRADE 0 4 4 0
Tele-ultrasound in resource-limited settings: a systematic review GRADE 0 0 1 0
Relationship between caffeine intake and infertility: a systematic review of controlled clinical studies GRADE 0 0 1 0
Zumba ®, fat mass and maximum oxygen consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis GRADE 0 0 1 0
Relationship between exposure to mixtures of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals and cancer risk: a systematic review GRADE 0 1 0 0
Current strategies and successes in engaging women in vector control: a systematic review GRADE 6 13 3 1
Do technical aids for patient handling prevent musculoskeletal complaints in health care workers? A systematic review of intervention studies GRADE 0 0 1 4
Gender-related differences in care-seeking behavior for newborns: a systematic review of the evidence in South Asia GRADE 0 0 1 1
The impact of financial incentives on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis GRADE 1 3 3 2
Physical activity interventions in faith-based organizations: a systematic review GRADE 0 0 0 1
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in migrants in the EUEEA: a systematic review GRADE 0 1 1 0
The most effective amount of forward movement for oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review GRADE 0 0 3 5
Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences GRADE 0 0 0 15
Socioeconomic status throughout life and body mass index: a systematic review and meta-analysis GRADE 0 0 0 1
Does short message service improve focused antenatal care visit and skilled birth attendance? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials GRADE 0 2 0 0
Corticosteroids on the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systemic review and meta-analysis GRADE 0 0 0 12
Utilization of public health care by people with private health insurance: a systematic review and meta-analysis GRADE 0 1 4 0
Burnout in palliative care nurses, prevalence and risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis OCEBM NA NA NA NA
Total - 11 27 28 45

aFor systematic reviews that used GRADE to assess the quality of the body of evidence for critical or important outcomes, the number of outcomes assessed as high, moderate, low or very low certainty of evidence is presented.

Only 20 out of the 301 included systematic reviews assessed the certainty of the body of evidence. We would like to point out that when reporting results for the GRADE assessments, these assessments are made at the level of individual outcomes, and some included reviews may thus contribute more than one assessment.

GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach; OCEBM, Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine; NA, Not applicable.