Table 2.
Results of subgroup analysis of depression.
| Subgroups | I 2 | Studies (n) | Participants (n) | SMD | 95% CI | P (overall effects) | P (group differences) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form of intervention | P = 0.02 | ||||||
| Individual sessions | 0% | 2 | 119 | −1.21 | −1.60, −0.81 | P < 0.00001 | |
| Group sessions | 74% | 10 | 592 | −0.58 | −0.93, −0.23 | P = 0.001 | |
| Duration of intervention | P = 0.06 | ||||||
| <8weeks | 77% | 4 | 186 | −0.75 | −1.41, −0.08 | P = 0.03 | |
| =8weeks | 0% | 3 | 211 | −1.14 | −1.43, −0.84 | P < 0.00001 | |
| >8weeks | 36% | 5 | 314 | −0.51 | −0.84, −0.18 | P = 0.003 | |
| Setting of intervention | P = 0.02 | ||||||
| Care home | 63% | 9 | 511 | −0.60 | −0.92, −0.28 | P = 0.0003 | |
| Community | 0% | 3 | 200 | −1.12 | −1.42, −0.82 | P < 0.00001 |
I2, heterogeneity; SMD, standardized mean difference.