Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;23(7):3396. doi: 10.3390/s23073396

Table 1.

Quality assessment of studies based on the EPHPP criteria (studies sorted by disease alphabetically, SB: Selection Bias, SD: Study Design, CF: Confounders, BL: Blinding, DC: Data Collection, WD: Withdrawals and Dropouts, GR: EPHPP Global Rating, W: Weak, M: Moderate, S: Strong).

Authors SB SD CF BL DC WD GR
Ellis et al., 2019 [32] M S M M M S S
Ginis et al., 2016 [33] W S W W S S W
Landers et al., 2020 [34] W M W M M W W
Golan et al., 2020 [35] S S M M M S S
Nasseri et al., 2020 [36] M S M M S S S
Pedullà et al., 2016 [37] M S S S S S S
Van Geel et al., 2020 [38] M M W M S M M
Burgos et al., 2020 [39] M S W M S W W
Chae et al., 2020 [40] M M S M M M S
Choi et al., 2016 [41] W S W S S S W
Chung et al., 2020 [42] M S S S W S M
Grau-Pellicer et al., 2020 [43] W S S W S S W
Ifejika et al., 2020 [44] M S S S S M S
Kang et al., 2019 [45] M S S M S M S
Langan et al., 2020 [46] W M W M S S W
Paul et al., 2016 [47] M S W W S S W
Requena et al., 2019 [48] W M M M M W W
Sarfo et al., 2018 [49] M M W M S S M
Sawant et al., 2020 [50] W W W M S S W
Verna et al., 2020 [51] M S S M S S S
Xu et al., 2021 [52] W W S M M W W