Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;29(6):e202202264. doi: 10.1002/chem.202202264

Table 1.

Relative Gibbs free energies [kcal ⋅ mol−1] of the selected conformations of unsubstituted hexa‐, hepta‐, and octaphyrins with distinct global charge and oxidation states.[a]

[26]2−

[26]

[28]

[28]2+

[32]4−

[32]

[32]3+

[36]2−

[36]

[36]2+

[38]2+

R

0.0

8.1

7.6

0.0

H

0.0

29.8

0.8

H a

12.2

33.4

13.7

0.0

D

27.7

0.0

0.0

8.1

M

24.2

11.9

0.0

H b

17.0

49.8

31.6

5.8

T

7.1

27.8

28.7

9.5

F

[b]

0.0

7.5

M a

1.2

27.9

4.6

10.9

M

[b]

21.5

5.9

3.8

M b

21.4

49.7

27.9

11.0

F

50.3

17.9

8.8

[b]

F a

12.6

0.0

1.5

2.3

F b

0.0

14.5

0.0

9.7

[a] Gibbs free energies at the M06‐2X/6‐311+G(d,p)//CAM‐B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) level of theory. [b] The optimization of 28F2+ , 26M2− , and 32F4− did not lead to minimum geometry compatible with these conformations; instead it led to untwisted geometries.