Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;62(3):e202213508. doi: 10.1002/anie.202213508

Table 1.

Optimization of halosulfonylation of 1.[a]

graphic file with name ANIE-62-0-g004.jpg

Entry

Substrate

Hal+

Solvent

Yield 3a or 3b [%][b]

1

2a

NIS

THF

41

2

2a

ICl

THF

49

3

2a

DIH

THF

78

4

2a

DID

THF

31

5

2a

I2

THF

7[c]

6

2a

DIH

Et2O

quant.

7

2a

DIH

H2O

99

8

2a

DIH

CH2Cl2

quant.[d]

9[e]

2a

DIH

Et2O

nr

10

2a

DBH

Et2O

9

11

2a

DBH

Et2O

quant.[d,f]

12

2a

NBS

Et2O

50[f]

13

2b

I2

Et2O

91[d,g]

14

2b

Br2

Et2O

97[d,g]

[a] Optimization carried out on 0.15 mmol scale, with 2.5 equiv sulfinate (1.0 M in H2O), 1.0 equiv of halogenating agent and 1.0 equiv of 1 (0.75 M in Et2O). [b] 1H NMR yields calculated with mesitylene as internal standard. [c] 18 % di‐iodo BCP observed. [d] Isolated yield. [e] Reaction run in the dark. [f] 18 h reaction time after addition of 1. [g] 1.0 equiv of pre‐isolated sulfonyl halide and 1.3 equiv of 1 were reacted in Et2O for 15 h at rt. X/Hal=Halogen. DXH=dihalohydantoin. DXD=dihalodimedone. NXS=N‐halosuccinimide p‐Tol=para‐tolyl. nr = no reaction.