Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;75(1):4–14. doi: 10.1002/art.42338

Table 4.

Proposal for a future research agenda on TMJ arthritis in patients with JIA*

Future research agenda Level of importance
Etiology and diagnosis of TMJ arthritis
Identification of biomarkers for TMJ disease progression and treatment response 8.7
Effect of inflammation on facial growth 8.6
Differentiating JIA‐induced TMJ arthritis from idiopathic condylar resorption 7.9
Clinical diagnosis of TMJ arthritis 7.6
TMJ imaging
Standardization of MRI assessment 9.4
Develop noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques for young/noncooperative children 7.9
Systemic treatment of TMJ arthritis
Prospective evaluation of systemic therapy on TMJ arthritis: methotrexate versus biologics as first‐line therapy 8.2
Orthopedic/orthodontic treatment of dentofacial deformity
Effect of different types of orthopedic appliances (oral splints) for treatment of dentofacial deformity 8.3
Determine optimal developmental stage for initiation of orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with oral splints. 7.7
Surgical treatment of dentofacial deformity
Prospective evaluation of surgical treatment modalities for arthritis‐related dentofacial deformity 7.8
Intraarticular treatment of TMJ arthritis
Impact of intraarticular steroid on condylar growth 7.9
Study the effects of intraarticular administration drug therapy 7.7
Controlled randomized trial of intraarticular lavage and steroids versus intraarticular lavage alone versus control 7.6
Guidelines and protocols
Develop an interdisciplinary management algorithm for TMJ arthritis management 8.2
Develop recommendations for monitoring orofacial health in JIA 8.2
Tutorial instruction video for standardized orofacial examination 7.4
Develop orofacial examination protocol for small children (2–5 years old) with JIA 7.4
Patient‐reported outcome
Study quality of life of patients and families with JIA and TMJ arthritis 8.4
Study the burden of care for patients with TMJ arthritis/TMJ involvement/dentofacial deformity 8
*

Levels of importance were assessed using a 10‐point visual analog scale, with 0 being not important and 10 being extremely important. See Table 3 for definitions.