Table 2. Summary of the Localization Precision and Classification of Controlled Releases and Detection Reports of Participating Solutionsb.
count |
number
of TP Localization |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | controlled releases | detection reports | equipment unit | equipment group | facility | TP (%)a | FN (%) | FP (%) |
E | 567 | 2382 | 232 | 207 | 58 | 87.7 | 12.3 | 79.1 |
F | 571 | 469 | 98 | 200 | 100 | 69.7 | 30.3 | 15.1 |
A | 571 | 834 | 111 | 156 | 129 | 69.4 | 30.6 | 52.5 |
D | 571 | 346 | 0 | 177 | 158 | 58.7 | 41.3 | 3.2 |
B | 442 | 213 | 122 | 26 | 23 | 38.7 | 61.3 | 19.7 |
C | 557 | 214 | 2 | 1 | 191 | 34.8 | 65.2 | 9.3 |
J | 284 | 68 | 67 | 0 | 1 | 23.9 | 76.1 | 0.0 |
H | 368 | 37 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 9.2 | 90.8 | 8.1 |
I | 354 | 31 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 7.9 | 92.1 | 9.7 |
G | 206 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3.9 | 96.1 | 33.3 |
K | 746 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 99.7 | 0.0 |
TP (%) shown in this table is the percentage of controlled releases detected by a solution across all localization levels (equipment unit, group, and facility).
Solutions are sorted in the order of the declining true positive (TP) detection rate.