Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 13:1–14. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01038-9

Table 4.

Meta-analyses on severity considering different genetic models

Gene N studies N participants OR (95% CI) p I2
ACE1_rs4646994_rs1799752
Dominant (DD vs II + DI) 13 3042 1.50 (1.10–2.06) 0.01 67%
Recessive (DD + ID vs II) 13 3105 1.31 (0.94–1.81) 0.11 59%
Homozygous (DD vs II) 13 1720 1.53 (1.23–1.9) 0.0002 63%
Additive () 13 2275 1.41 (1.02–1.94) 0.04 62%
ACE2_rs2285666
Dominant (GG + GA vs AA) 3 454 2.24 (0.90- 5.61) 0.08 0%
Recessive (GG vs GA + AA) 3 454 2.18 (1.28- 3.72) 0.04 16%
Homozygous (GG vs AA) 3 370 2.52 (1.00—6.33) 0.05 0%
Additive (GG vs GA) 3 418 2.03 (1.10- 3.76) 0.02 0%
IFTM3_rs12252
Dominant (CC + CT vs TT) 3 630 1.14 (0.68- 1.94) 0.61 0%
Recessive (CC vs CT + TT) 3 630 2.27 (0.98- 5.25) 0.05 0%
Homozygous (CC vs TT) 3 539 1.60 (0.58- 4.42) 0.37 0%
Additive (CC vs CT) 3 124 2.60 (1.04- 6.52) 0.04 0%
TMPRSS2_rs12329760
Dominant (CC + CT vs TTI) 4 2492 0.72 (0.04- 12.18) 0.82 96%
Recessive (CC vs CT + TT) 4 1132 0.92 (0.44- 1.89) 0.82 83%
Homozygous (CC vs TT) 4 659 1.08 (0.33- 3.47) 0.90 73%
Additive (CC vs CT) 4 986 0.89 (0.44- 1.80) 0.74 80%
TNFα_rs1800629
Dominant (AA + AG vs GG) 4 748 1.17 (0.85–1.60) 0.34 38%
Recessive (AA vs AG + GG) 4 440 1.26 (0.82–1.92) 0.29 0%
Homozygous (AA vs GG) 4 428 1.14 (0.96–1.36) 0.14 0%
Additive (AA vs GA) 4 445 1.13 (0.72–1.77) 0.61 0%