Table 7.
Moderated Dyadic Growth Curve Model for Study 2 examining the impact of provided support mean levels and fluctuations on relationship satisfaction
| 95% CI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | b | SE | df | t | p | lower | upper | |MDE| |
|
| ||||||||
| (Intercept) | 42.51 | 0.24 | 600.54 | 180.65 | < .001 | 42.06 | 42.97 | |
| Time | −0.03 | 0.01 | 644.47 | −2.6 | 0.01 | −0.05 | −0.01 | |
| Gender | −0.09 | 0.19 | 278.3 | −0.45 | 0.66 | −0.46 | 0.28 | |
| Intercept | ||||||||
| Actor Provided Support Mean Levels | 3.83 | 0.47 | 1447.53 | 8.06 | < .001 | 2.91 | 4.78 | 0.89 |
| Gender × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels | 0.18 | 0.46 | 1299.3 | 0.4 | 0.69 | −0.71 | 1.07 | 0.91 |
| Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | −2.94 | 1.35 | 573.5 | −2.18 | 0.03 | −5.54 | −0.32 | |
| Gender × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | 2.80 | 1.36 | 597.01 | 2.05 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 5.43 | |
| Partner Provided Support Mean Levels | −1.70 | 1.12 | 518.94 | −1.52 | 0.13 | −3.87 | 0.47 | 0.91 |
| Gender × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels | −1.18 | 1.1 | 478.93 | −1.07 | 0.28 | −3.32 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
| Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −2.63 | 1.56 | 512.42 | −1.69 | 0.09 | −5.64 | 0.39 | |
| Gender × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −1.57 | 1.56 | 513.49 | −1.01 | 0.31 | −4.58 | 1.44 | |
| Actor Provided Support Mean Levels × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | 2.28 | 1.95 | 1391.94 | 1.17 | 0.24 | −1.57 | 6.04 | |
| Gender × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | 0.91 | 1.9 | 1330.62 | 0.48 | 0.63 | −2.77 | 4.64 | |
| Partner Provided Support Mean Levels × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | 3.02 | 4.01 | 518.66 | 0.75 | 0.45 | −4.79 | 10.79 | |
| Gender × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.78 | 3.93 | 476.85 | −0.2 | 0.84 | −8.38 | 6.82 | |
| Slope | ||||||||
| Time × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels | 0.00 | 0.03 | 1202.76 | 0.11 | 0.92 | −0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Gender × Time × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1044.09 | 1.36 | 0.17 | −0.01 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Time × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.31 | 0.07 | 1193.51 | −4.58 | < .001 | −0.44 | −0.18 | 0.06 |
| Gender × Time × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1170.94 | 0.32 | 0.75 | −0.11 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Time × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1163.17 | 0.57 | 0.57 | −0.07 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Gender × Time × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels | −0.02 | 0.05 | 1056.99 | −0.50 | 0.62 | −0.12 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Time × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.24 | 0.07 | 1165.73 | −3.40 | < .001 | −0.38 | −0.10 | 0.07 |
| Gender × Time × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | 0.07 | 0.07 | 1136.1 | 1.02 | 0.31 | −0.07 | 0.21 | 0.08 |
| Time × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | 0.16 | 0.1 | 1252.53 | 1.67 | 0.10 | −0.03 | 0.34 | 0.19 |
| Gender × Time × Actor Provided Support Mean Levels × Actor Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.2 | 0.09 | 1226.07 | −2.17 | 0.03 | −0.38 | −0.02 | 0.20 |
| Time × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.15 | 0.19 | 1157.97 | −0.83 | 0.41 | −0.52 | 0.21 | 0.20 |
| Gender × Time × Partner Provided Support Mean Levels × Partner Provided Support Fluctuations | −0.23 | 0.17 | 1149.87 | −1.31 | 0.19 | −0.56 | 0.11 | 0.21 |
Note: We did not examine the impact of fluctuations on intercepts as they would require predicting a preceding event from future reports.